ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022
Short-term efficacy and adverse effects of collagenase clostridium histolyticum injections, percutaneous needle fasciotomy and limited fasciectomy in the treatment of Dupuytren's contracture: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Collagenase clostridium histolyticum injection versus limited fasciectomy for the treatment of Dupuytren's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Early postinterventional clinical implications of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum injection versus limited fasciectomy for Dupuytren's disease.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2025Article
- Therapy for Dupuytren's Disease (II): Collagenase Therapy vs. Limited Fasciectomy-A Long-Term Comparative Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bias in published randomized trials that compare collagenase injection with percutaneous needle fasciotomy in the treatment of Dupuytren disease: a systematic review.EFORT open reviews · 2024Article
- Comparing Collagenase and Tissue Subcision for Cellulite Treatment of the Buttock and Thigh Regions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Patient-Reported Outcome in Dupuytren's Disease Treated With Fasciectomy, Collagenase or Needle Fasciotomy: A Swedish Registry Study.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2023Article
- The biotechnological potential of proteases from hematophagous arthropod vectors.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsDupuytren's contracture (DC) is a chronic debilitating fibroproliferative disorder. Common treatment options include collagenase clostridium histolyticum injections (CI), percutaneous needle fasciotomy (NF) and limited fasciectomy (LF). Superiority of one specific treatment remains controversial. This study aims to assess the short-term efficacy and safety of CI, NF, and LF for the treatment of DC.
methodsWe included randomized controlled trials of CI compared with placebo, NF and LF for patients with DC. PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to August 2021. Contracture reduction rates in treated joints (within 0-5° of full extension within 30 days), relative reduction in total passive extension deficit (TPED), occurrence of one or more adverse events and number of treatment-related adverse events per patient were the outcomes of interest. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was employed for quality assessment of the studies. A network meta-analysis was performed using MetaXL.
resultsNine studies met our inclusion criteria (n = 903). Overall, risk bias was mixed and mostly low. Short term TPED reduction achieved with LF was superior compared to CI and NF. Although CI achieved greater TPED reduction compared to NF, it was associated with the highest risk of overall adverse effects. The analyzed data was limited to a maximum three-year follow-up period and therefore insufficient for long-term outcome evaluation.
conclusionsIn DC, LF may be able to provide patients with severe disease, superior flexion contracture release postoperatively. CI is a valid treatment alternative to NF, however the higher risk of overall adverse effects must be considered. The quality-of-evidence is limited due to short-term follow-up periods and a lack of standardized definitions of complications and adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.