ReviewTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2023
Considering Global Development? Insights from Applications for FDA Breakthrough Therapy and EMA PRIME Designations.
Review in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regulatory Convergence in Cell and Gene Therapy: Harmonizing Quality, CMC, and Approval Pathways Across the FDA, EMA, PMDA, and Emerging Markets.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2026Review
- The Combat Against Antimicrobial Resistance: An Overview of EU Recent Health Policies and Drug Regulations Promoting the Development of New Antimicrobials.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2026Review
- From Bench to Bedside: Ethical and Clinical Best Practices for Genome Editing Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Transforming Alzheimer's Treatment: Unveiling New Potential with Drug Repurposing Strategies.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Trends in orphan medicinal products approvals in the European Union between 2010-2022.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) each have programs to expedite development of products identified as having potential to address unmet medical needs: the Breakthrough therapy (BT) and Regenerative Medicines Advanced Therapies designation programs in the US and the Priority Medicines (PRIME) scheme at EMA. We reviewed commonalities and differences in requests submitted and products designated through these programs, with the intent to explore ways to better support global development. During the period from PRIME's launch in April 2016 to 31 December 2020, 151 requests were made to both BT and PRIME programs and the agencies reached concordant outcomes to grant or deny requests for almost two thirds of the cases (93/151, 62%), suggesting similar perspectives across international regulators on the potential of the products under study. Forty-two (42/151, 28%) products were granted both BT and PRIME, thus found by both Agencies to have the potential to address an unmet need for a serious condition, and thereby products for which efficient development would be highly desirable. Working toward better engagement on global development strategies is in the best interests of patients and public health. With this in mind, Agencies and sponsors should take advantage of existing collaborative opportunities, such as parallel scientific advice, and work to identify fresh approaches to support global development of products for unmet medical needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.