ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2023
3D-Printed Tumor Phantoms for Assessment of In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging Analysis Methods.
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indocyanine green excitation-emission matrix characterization: excitation-dependent emission shifts and application-specific spectra.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Real-time fidelity assessment of fluorescence molecular imaging without reference images.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Optical phantoms for the characterization and validation of imaging and spectroscopy: a review.Biophotonics discovery · 2026Review
- Toward fluorescence digital twins: multi-parameter experimental validation of fluorescence Monte Carlo simulations using solid phantoms.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Reflect: reporting guidelines for preclinical, translational and clinical fluorescence molecular imaging studies.Npj imaging · 2025Article
- Indocyanine green excitation-emission matrix characterization: excitation-dependent emission shifts and application-specific spectra.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Development of a multiparameter phantom system for multispectral imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- First-in-Human Study of ABY-029, a Novel Fluorescent Peptide that Targets EGFR, Applied to Soft-Tissue Sarcomas.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2025Article
- Article
- Elucidating the effect of tumor and background region-of-interest selection on the performance metrics used to assess fluorescence imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Direct 3-D printing of complex optical phantoms using dynamic filament mixing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Ex Vivo Human Tissue Functions as a Testing Platform for the Evaluation of a Nerve-Specific Fluorophore.Molecular imaging and biology · 2025Article
- Impact of signal-to-noise ratio and contrast definition on the sensitivity assessment and benchmarking of fluorescence molecular imaging systems.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Fabrication of complex optical phantoms using on-the-fly multi-filament mixing 3-D printing.Research square · 2024Article
- Effects of phantom microstructure on their optical properties.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a 3D Printed Silicone Oral Cavity Cancer Model for Surgical Simulations.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- 3D Printing for Cancer Diagnosis: What Unique Advantages Are Gained?ACS materials Au · 2023Review
- Ambient Light Resistant Shortwave Infrared Fluorescence Imaging for Preclinical Tumor Delineation via the pH Low-Insertion Peptide Conjugated to Indocyanine Green.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023Article
- Smartphone-based dual radiometric fluorescence and white-light imager for quantification of protoporphyrin IX in skin.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- Editorial to the Special Issue Entitled "Optical Surgical Navigation".Molecular imaging and biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeInterventional fluorescence imaging is increasingly being utilized to quantify cancer biomarkers in both clinical and preclinical models, yet absolute quantification is complicated by many factors. The use of optical phantoms has been suggested by multiple professional organizations for quantitative performance assessment of fluorescence guidance imaging systems. This concept can be further extended to provide standardized tools to compare and assess image analysis metrics. PROCEDURES: 3D-printed fluorescence phantoms based on solid tumor models were developed with representative bio-mimicking optical properties. Phantoms were produced with discrete tumors embedded with an NIR fluorophore of fixed concentration and either zero or 3% non-specific fluorophore in the surrounding material. These phantoms were first imaged by two fluorescence imaging systems using two methods of image segmentation, and four assessment metrics were calculated to demonstrate variability in the quantitative assessment of system performance. The same analysis techniques were then applied to one tumor model with decreasing tumor fluorophore concentrations.
resultsThese anatomical phantom models demonstrate the ability to use 3D printing to manufacture anthropomorphic shapes with a wide range of reduced scattering (μ
conclusions3D printing techniques provide a platform for demonstrating complex biological models that introduce real-world complexities for quantifying fluorescence image data. Controlled iterative development of these phantom designs can be used as a tool to advance the field and provide context for consensus-building beyond performance assessment of fluorescence imaging platforms, and extend support for standardizing how quantitative metrics are extracted from imaging data and reported in literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.