Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2023
Comparison of corneal flap thickness predictability and architecture between femtosecond laser and sub-Bowman keratomileusis microkeratome in laser in situ keratomileusis.
Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04684888 (Comparison of Corneal Flap Thickness Using Visumax Femto-Lasik With SubBowman Keratomileusis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Corneal Flap Thickness Using Visumax Femto-Lasik With SubBowman Keratomileusis (SBK) Microkeratome
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Refractive Surgery: An Overview.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of the studyThe purpose of the study is to assess and compare the corneal flap thickness predictability and uniformity between Visumax femtosecond laser and Moria sub-Bowman keratomileusis microkeratome in laser in situ keratomileusis procedure to correct myopic and myopic astigmatism refractive errors.
methodsOne hundred eyes from 100 patients were enrolled in this study. Only one eye (right eye) of each patient was chosen for this study. They were divided into two groups of equal size (50 each). Target flap thickness was 90 μm. Flap thickness was measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography in 7 specified positions at 3 months postoperative.
resultsFor femtosecond laser group, the average central flap thickness (CFT) was 91.35 µm ± 4.97. There was no statistically significant difference between the target flap thickness and the resultant flap thickness (p = 0.12). When the central, nasal and temporal thicknesses in the same flap were compared, there was no statistically significant difference among these measurements (p = 0.9). For the microkeratome group, CFT was 102.18 µm ± 5.63. There was statistically significant difference between the target flap thickness and the resultant flap thickness (p = 0.001). The central, nasal and temporal thicknesses were compared and there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.000).
conclusionsOur study is among few studies in the literature comparing femtosecond laser flap to SBK microkeratome flap. Femtosecond laser creates more predictable flap thickness and more uniform flap architecture. Trial registration Trial registration number: NCT04684888. Trial Registration date: December 2020. Registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov .
Indexed as
Identifiers
36307607What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.