ArticleOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022
[Synthetic bone replacement substances].
Article in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Treatment of bony defects in femur and tibia : Established and new concepts].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- [Preparation andZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024Article
- [Reconstruction of posttraumatic deformities and defects].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone substitute materials have been successfully used for bone defects in orthopedics and trauma surgery for a long time; however, there are cases, especially in bone defects with a critical size, in which the treatment is complicated. Nowadays, multiple bone substitute materials are available. Autologous cancellous bone grafts remain the gold standard among the bone replacement materials; however, donor site morbidity and the limited availability of autologous cancellous bone represent restrictions for autologous bone grafting. Allogeneic cancellous bone grafts have also been successfully for years in the treatment of bone defects; however, infection rates of more than 10% have been described for the use of allogeneic cancellous bone. By introducing synthetic bone substitutes further alternatives are currently available to the user for the individual treatment of bone defects. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of various synthetic bone substitute materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36307604What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.