ArticleEuropean radiology2023
SAM-X: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography.
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Semi-supervised Label Generation for 3D Multi-modal MRI Bone Tumor Segmentation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- A deep learning approach for projection and body-side classification in musculoskeletal radiographs.European radiology experimental · 2024Article
- How AI May Transform Musculoskeletal Imaging.Radiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a two-phased deep learning sorting algorithm for post-X-ray image acquisition in order to facilitate large musculoskeletal image datasets according to their anatomical entity.
methodsIn total, 42,608 unstructured and pseudonymized radiographs were retrieved from the PACS of a musculoskeletal tumor center. In phase 1, imaging data were sorted into 1000 clusters by a self-supervised model. A human-in-the-loop radiologist assigned weak, semantic labels to all clusters and clusters with the same label were merged. Three hundred thirty-two non-musculoskeletal clusters were discarded. In phase 2, the initial model was modified by "injecting" the identified labels into the self-supervised model to train a classifier. To provide statistical significance, data split and cross-validation were applied. The hold-out test set consisted of 50% external data. To gain insight into the model's predictions, Grad-CAMs were calculated.
resultsThe self-supervised clustering resulted in a high normalized mutual information of 0.930. The expert radiologist identified 28 musculoskeletal clusters. The modified model achieved a classification accuracy of 96.2% and 96.6% for validation and hold-out test data for predicting the top class, respectively. When considering the top two predicted class labels, an accuracy of 99.7% and 99.6% was accomplished. Grad-CAMs as well as final cluster results underlined the robustness of the proposed method by showing that it focused on similar image regions a human would have considered for categorizing images.
conclusionFor efficient dataset building, we propose an accurate deep learning sorting algorithm for classifying radiographs according to their anatomical entity in the assessment of musculoskeletal diseases. KEY POINTS: • Classification of large radiograph datasets according to their anatomical entity. • Paramount importance of structuring vast amounts of retrospective data for modern deep learning applications. • Optimization of the radiological workflow and increase in efficiency as well as decrease of time-consuming tasks for radiologists through deep learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.