Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36307553›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

SAM-X: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography.

Florian Hinterwimmer, Sarah Consalvo, Nikolas Wilhelm, Fritz Seidl, Rainer H H Burgkart, Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe, Daniel Rueckert, Jan Neumann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Florian HinterwimmerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Orthopaedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 25, 81675, Munich, Germany. florian.hinterwimmer@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0273-0643
Sarah ConsalvoDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Orthopaedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 25, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Nikolas WilhelmDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Orthopaedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 25, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Fritz SeidlDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Rainer H H BurgkartDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Orthopaedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 25, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Rüdiger von Eisenhart-RotheDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Orthopaedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 25, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Daniel RueckertInstitute for AI and Informatics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jan NeumannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a two-phased deep learning sorting algorithm for post-X-ray image acquisition in order to facilitate large musculoskeletal image datasets according to their anatomical entity.

methodsIn total, 42,608 unstructured and pseudonymized radiographs were retrieved from the PACS of a musculoskeletal tumor center. In phase 1, imaging data were sorted into 1000 clusters by a self-supervised model. A human-in-the-loop radiologist assigned weak, semantic labels to all clusters and clusters with the same label were merged. Three hundred thirty-two non-musculoskeletal clusters were discarded. In phase 2, the initial model was modified by "injecting" the identified labels into the self-supervised model to train a classifier. To provide statistical significance, data split and cross-validation were applied. The hold-out test set consisted of 50% external data. To gain insight into the model's predictions, Grad-CAMs were calculated.

resultsThe self-supervised clustering resulted in a high normalized mutual information of 0.930. The expert radiologist identified 28 musculoskeletal clusters. The modified model achieved a classification accuracy of 96.2% and 96.6% for validation and hold-out test data for predicting the top class, respectively. When considering the top two predicted class labels, an accuracy of 99.7% and 99.6% was accomplished. Grad-CAMs as well as final cluster results underlined the robustness of the proposed method by showing that it focused on similar image regions a human would have considered for categorizing images.

conclusionFor efficient dataset building, we propose an accurate deep learning sorting algorithm for classifying radiographs according to their anatomical entity in the assessment of musculoskeletal diseases. KEY POINTS: • Classification of large radiograph datasets according to their anatomical entity. • Paramount importance of structuring vast amounts of retrospective data for modern deep learning applications. • Optimization of the radiological workflow and increase in efficiency as well as decrease of time-consuming tasks for radiologists through deep learning.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMusculoskeletal DiseasesAlgorithmsHumansRadiographyRetrospective StudiesX-RaysArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMusculoskeletal diseasesWorkflowX-ray

Identifiers

PMID36307553
PMCPMC9935683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.