Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36307544›Full record

ReviewNPJ digital medicine2022

Computer vision in surgery: from potential to clinical value.

Pietro Mascagni, Deepak Alapatt, Luca Sestini, Maria S Altieri, Amin Madani, Yusuke Watanabe, Adnan Alseidi, Jay A Redan, Sergio Alfieri, Guido Costamagna and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Colour-Guided Surgery: A Conceptual Framework for Multimodal Intraoperative Visualisation-A Narrative Review.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026
    Review
  10. Benchmarking deep learning pipelines for surgical instrument segmentation in endoscopic spine surgery: cross-dataset evaluation under deployment-realistic conditions.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Pietro Mascagni *Gemelli Hospital, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. pietro.mascagni@ihu-strasbourg.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-3023
Deepak Alapatt *ICube, University of Strasbourg, CNRS, IHU, Strasbourg, France.
Luca SestiniICube, University of Strasbourg, CNRS, IHU, Strasbourg, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5993-468X
Maria S AltieriGlobal Surgical Artificial Intelligence Collaborative, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Amin MadaniGlobal Surgical Artificial Intelligence Collaborative, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Yusuke WatanabeGlobal Surgical Artificial Intelligence Collaborative, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Adnan AlseidiGlobal Surgical Artificial Intelligence Collaborative, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jay A RedanDepartment of Surgery, AdventHealth-Celebration Health, Celebration, FL, USA.
Sergio AlfieriFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Guido CostamagnaFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Ivo BoškoskiFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8194-2670
Nicolas PadoyIHU-Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France.
Daniel A HashimotoGlobal Surgical Artificial Intelligence Collaborative, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4725-3104

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-10-IAHU-02Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-20-CHIA-0029-01EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 813782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hundreds of millions of operations are performed worldwide each year, and the rising uptake in minimally invasive surgery has enabled fiber optic cameras and robots to become both important tools to conduct surgery and sensors from which to capture information about surgery. Computer vision (CV), the application of algorithms to analyze and interpret visual data, has become a critical technology through which to study the intraoperative phase of care with the goals of augmenting surgeons' decision-making processes, supporting safer surgery, and expanding access to surgical care. While much work has been performed on potential use cases, there are currently no CV tools widely used for diagnostic or therapeutic applications in surgery. Using laparoscopic cholecystectomy as an example, we reviewed current CV techniques that have been applied to minimally invasive surgery and their clinical applications. Finally, we discuss the challenges and obstacles that remain to be overcome for broader implementation and adoption of CV in surgery.

Identifiers

PMID36307544
PMCPMC9616906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.