Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36307535›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2023

SARS-CoV-2 variant evasion of monoclonal antibodies based on in vitro studies.

MacGregor Cox, Thomas P Peacock, William T Harvey, Joseph Hughes, Derek W Wright, COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium, Brian J Willett, Emma Thomson, Ravindra K Gupta, Sharon J Peacock and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 213 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
213citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
32.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

213 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 350 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Efficacy of convalescent plasma in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: findings from a controlled trial.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2024
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Distinct CD8iScience · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

153 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

MacGregor CoxDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7408-4636
Thomas P PeacockDepartment of Infectious Disease, St Mary's Medical School, Imperial College London, London, UK.
William T HarveyMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9529-1127
Joseph HughesMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2556-2563
Derek W WrightMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0411-4497
COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium
Brian J WillettMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8912-3266
Emma ThomsonMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1482-0889
Ravindra K GuptaDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Sharon J PeacockDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1718-2782
David L RobertsonMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. david.l.robertson@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6338-0221
Alessandro M CarabelliDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK. alessandrocarabelli@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3625-4021
MRC University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBSt Mary's Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_19026Medical Research Council MC_PC_19027Medical Research Council MC_PC_20058Medical Research Council MC_UU_00034/6Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/12Medical Research Council MR/W005611/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) offer a treatment option for individuals with severe COVID-19 and are especially important in high-risk individuals where vaccination is not an option. Given the importance of understanding the evolution of resistance to mAbs by SARS-CoV-2, we reviewed the available in vitro neutralization data for mAbs against live variants and viral constructs containing spike mutations of interest. Unfortunately, evasion of mAb-induced protection is being reported with new SARS-CoV-2 variants. The magnitude of neutralization reduction varied greatly among mAb-variant pairs. For example, sotrovimab retained its neutralization capacity against Omicron BA.1 but showed reduced efficacy against BA.2, BA.4 and BA.5, and BA.2.12.1. At present, only bebtelovimab has been reported to retain its efficacy against all SARS-CoV-2 variants considered here. Resistance to mAb neutralization was dominated by the action of epitope single amino acid substitutions in the spike protein. Although not all observed epitope mutations result in increased mAb evasion, amino acid substitutions at non-epitope positions and combinations of mutations also contribute to evasion of neutralization. This Review highlights the implications for the rational design of viral genomic surveillance and factors to consider for the development of novel mAb therapies.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Amino Acid SubstitutionAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralEpitopesHumansAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralEpitopes

Identifiers

PMID36307535
PMCPMC9616429
OpenAlexW4307953698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.