Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36307502›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2022

The impact of esophageal device insertion on cuff pressure of endotracheal tube: a literature review and meta-analysis.

Kuo-Chuan Hung, Ying-Jen Chang, Yang-Pei Chang, Chun-Ning Ho, Kuo-Mao Lan, Jen-Yin Chen, Li-Kai Wang, Ping-Wen Huang, Cheuk-Kwan Sun

Open access · goldAbstract readReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kuo-Chuan HungDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.
Ying-Jen ChangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.
Yang-Pei ChangDepartment of Neurology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Chun-Ning HoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.
Kuo-Mao LanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.
Jen-Yin ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.
Li-Kai WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.
Ping-Wen Huang *Department of Emergency Medicine, Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua City, Taiwan.
Cheuk-Kwan Sun *Department of Emergency Medicine, E-Da Hospital, No.1, Yida Road, Jiaosu Village, Yanchao District, Kaohsiung City, 82445, Taiwan. researchgate000@gmail.com.
Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science · TWChi Mei Medical Center · TWChang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital · TWE-Da Hospital · TWKaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of intraoperative esophageal device insertion (EDI) on endotracheal tube (ET) cuff inflation pressure remains unclear. Electronic databases including Medline, Embase, Google scholar, Web of Science™ and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies involving EDI after placement of ETs from inception to July 7, 2022. The primary outcome was risk of high cuff pressure, while the secondary outcomes were increases in cuff pressure following EDI. Difference between adults and children was investigated with subgroup analysis. There were ten eligible studies (observation study, n = 9, randomized controlled study, n = 1) involving a total of 468 participants. EDI notably increased the risk of high cuff pressure (n = 7, risk ratio: 12.82, 95% confidence interval: 4.9 to 33.52, subgroup analysis: p = 0.008). There were significant elevations in cuff pressure in adults and children both during (13.42 and 7.88 cmH

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealTracheaAdultChildHumansPressureRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID36307502
PMCPMC9616852
OpenAlexW4307475648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.