Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36307160›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Framework to assess the quality of mHealth apps: a mixed-method international case study protocol.

Yong Yu Tan, Fionn Woulfe, Griphin Baxter Chirambo, Patrick Henn, Liezel Cilliers, Kayode Philip Fadahunsi, Simon D Taylor-Robinson, John O'Donoghue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Yong Yu TanSchool of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9333-7563
Fionn WoulfeSchool of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Griphin Baxter ChiramboFaculty of Health Sciences, Mzuzu University, Mzuzu, Malawi.
Patrick HennASSERT Centre, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Liezel CilliersDepartment of Information Systems, University of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa.
Kayode Philip FadahunsiPrimary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1470-5493
Simon D Taylor-RobinsonDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK s.taylor-robinson@imperial.ac.uk.
John O'DonoghueMalawi eHealth Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-6056-8640
University College Cork · IECentre College · USImperial College London · GBMzuzu University · MWPrimary Health Care · QAUniversity of Fort Hare · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealthcare professionals (HCPs) often recommend their patients to use a specific mHealth app as part of health promotion, disease prevention and patient self-management. There has been a significant growth in the number of HCPs downloading and using mobile health (mHealth) apps. Most mHealth apps that are available in app stores employ a 'star rating' system. This is based on user feedback on an app, but is highly subjective. Thus, the identification of quality mHealth apps which are deemed fit for purpose can be a difficult task for HCPs. Currently, there is no unified, validated standard guidelines for assessment of mHealth apps for patient safety, which can be used by HCPs. The Modified Enlight Suite (MES) is a quality assessment framework designed to provide a means for HCPs to evaluate mHealth apps before they are recommended to patients. MES was adapted from the original Enlight Suite for international use through a Delphi method, followed by preliminary validation process among a population predominantly consisting of medical students. This study aims to evaluate the applicability and validity of the MES, by HCPs, in low, middle and high income country settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: MES will be evaluated through a mixed-method study, consisting of qualitative (focus group) and quantitative (survey instruments) research, in three target countries: Malaŵi (low income), South Africa (middle income) and Ireland (high income). The focus groups will be conducted through Microsoft Teams (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA) and surveys will be conducted online using Qualtrics (Qualtrics International, Seattle, Washington, USA). Participants will be recruited through the help of national representatives in Malawi (Mzuzu University), South Africa (University of Fort Hare) and Ireland (University College Cork) by email invitation. Data analysis for the focus group will be by the means of thematic analysis. Data analysis for the survey will use descriptive statistics and use Cronbach alpha as an indicator of internal consistency of the MES. The construct validity of the mHealth app will be assessed by computing the confirmatory factor analysis using Amos. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval from the Social Research Ethics Committee (SREC) SREC/SOM/03092021/1 at University College Cork, Ireland, Malaŵi Research Ethics Committee (MREC), Malaŵi MZUNIREC/DOR/21/59 and Inter-Faculty Research Ethics Committee (IFREC) of University of Fort Hare (REC-2 70 710-028-RA). The results of the study will be disseminated through the internet, peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

Indexed as

HaresMobile ApplicationsSelf-ManagementTelemedicineAnimalsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth informaticsHealth & safetyProtocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID36307160
PMCPMC9621190
OpenAlexW4307468510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.