ArticleArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2023
Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Identifying Barriers, Facilitators, and Strategies for Implementation in Research, Education, and Clinical Care.
Article in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06855186 (Symptom-Targeted Approach to Rehabilitation for Concussion), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Symptom-Targeted Approach to Rehabilitation for Concussion (STAR-C): RCT of In-person vs Telehealth vs Wait List Control
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Staff perspectives on the implementation of interventions for people with congenital disabilities: a mixed-methods systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Reliability and Dosage of Common Ingredients in Standard-of-Care Therapy for Vocal Hyperfunction.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026Article
- Ten Recommendations for Improving Research on Stroke Motor Rehabilitation: A Unified Perspective.Restorative neurology and neuroscience · 2026Review
- Application status of the CFIR-ERIC matching tool in healthcare context: a scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2026Article
- 'Making the System Work': A Multi-Site Qualitative Study of Dietitians' Use of iEMR to Support Nutrition Care Transitions for Older Adults with Malnutrition.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bundling implementation strategies supports outcome measure adoption in stroke rehabilitation: preliminary findings.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- AMEsobreRuedas Early Powered Mobility in Children with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type I: Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Early Boost of Linguistic Skills? Individualized Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Early Postacute Aphasia.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System for Voice Therapy: Application to Everyday Clinical Care.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2024Article
- Goal Setting in Speech-Language Pathology: A Pilot Test of a 'One-Size-Fits-All' Planning Framework.International journal of language & communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore rehabilitation professionals' experiences and perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) in research, education, and clinical care.
designA cross-sectional survey with free text and binary responses was completed by rehabilitation professionals. Survey data were analyzed with a deductive approach of directed content analysis using 2 implementation science frameworks: Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC).
settingRehabilitation professionals across research, educational, and clinical settings.
participantsOne hundred and eleven rehabilitation professionals-including speech-language pathologists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, physicians, psychologists, researchers, and clinic directors-who explored possible uses or applications of the RTSS for clinical care, education, or research (N=111).
interventionsNot applicable.
main outcome measuresFrequency of reported CFIR barriers and facilitators, as well as keywords related to CFIR and ERIC constructs.
resultsThe barriers and facilitating strategies differed according to the end-users' intended use, that is, research, education, or clinical. Overall, the 4 most frequently encountered CFIR barriers were the RTSS's complexity, a lack of available RTSS resources, reduced access to knowledge and information about the RTSS, and limited knowledge and beliefs about the RTSS. The ERIC-CFIR matching tool identified 7 ERIC strategies to address these barriers, which include conducting educational meetings, developing and distributing educational materials, accessing new funding, capturing and sharing local knowledge, identifying and preparing champions, and promoting adaptability.
conclusionsWhen attempting to use the RTSS, rehabilitation professionals commonly encountered barriers to understanding and skillfully using the framework. Theory-driven implementation strategies have been identified that have potential for addressing the RTSS's complexity and lack of educational and skill-building resources. Future work can develop the identified implementation strategies and evaluate their effects on RTSS implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.