Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36306840›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2023

An exploration of challenges associated with machine learning for time series forecasting of COVID-19 community spread using wastewater-based epidemiological data.

Liam Vaughan, Muyang Zhang, Haoran Gu, Joan B Rose, Colleen C Naughton, Gertjan Medema, Vajra Allan, Anne Roiko, Linda Blackall, Arash Zamyadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Liam VaughanChemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Water Research Australia, Melbourne Based Team, Melbourne, Australia.
Muyang ZhangChemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Haoran GuChemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Joan B RoseDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States of America.
Colleen C NaughtonCivil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Merced, Merced, United States of America.
Gertjan MedemaKWR Water Research Institute, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Vajra AllanPATH, Seattle, United States of America.
Anne RoikoSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, and Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Linda BlackallSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Arash ZamyadiChemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Water Research Australia, Melbourne Based Team, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: arash.zamyadi@unimelb.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) has gained increasing attention as a complementary tool to conventional surveillance methods with potential for significant resource and labour savings when used for public health monitoring. Using WBE datasets to train machine learning algorithms and develop predictive models may also facilitate early warnings for the spread of outbreaks. The challenges associated with using machine learning for the analysis of WBE datasets and timeseries forecasting of COVID-19 were explored by running Random Forest (RF) algorithms on WBE datasets across 108 sites in five regions: Scotland, Catalonia, Ohio, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. This method uses measurements of SARS-CoV-2 RNA fragment concentration in samples taken at the inlets of wastewater treatment plants, providing insight into the prevalence of infection in upstream wastewater catchment populations. RF's forecasting performance at each site was quantitatively evaluated by determining mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values, which was used to highlight challenges affecting future implementations of RF for WBE forecasting efforts. Performance was generally poor using WBE datasets from Catalonia, Scotland, and Ohio with 'reasonable' or better forecasts constituting 0 %, 5 %, and 0 % of these regions' forecasts, respectively. RF's performance was much stronger with WBE data from the Netherlands and Switzerland, which provided 55 % and 45 % 'reasonable' or better forecasts respectively. Sampling frequency and training set size were identified as key factors contributing to accuracy, while inclusion of too many unnecessary variables (or e.g., flow data) was identified as a contributing factor to poor performance. The contribution of catchment population on forecast accuracy was more ambiguous. This study determined that the factors governing RF's forecast performance are complicated and interrelated, which presents challenges for further work in this space. A sufficiently accurate further iteration of the tool discussed within this study would provide significant but varying value for public health departments for monitoring future, or ongoing outbreaks, assisting the implementation of on-time health response measures.

Indexed as

COVID-19Wastewater-Based Epidemiological MonitoringForecastingHumansMachine LearningRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Time FactorsWastewaterRNA, ViralWastewaterCOVID-19Machine learningTime series forecastingWastewater-based epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID36306840
PMCPMC9597519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.