Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36306496›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2022

Adaptation of Remote Symptom Monitoring Using Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes for Implementation in Real-World Settings.

Gabrielle B Rocque, D'Ambra N Dent, Stacey A Ingram, Nicole E Caston, Haley B Thigpen, Fallon R Lalor, Omer H Jamy, Smith Giri, Andres Azuero, Jennifer Young Pierce and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Telehealth education alone is not enough: toward closed-loop supportive oncology.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  11. Adaptation of digital integration of PROMs and PREMs in oncology during implementation: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Roles undertaken by family caregivers to help individuals with cancer manage symptoms: a qualitative study of caregivers, patients, and oncology clinicians.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabrielle B RocqueUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0003-4188-9785
D'Ambra N DentUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Birmingham, AL.
Stacey A IngramUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Birmingham, AL.
Nicole E CastonUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0001-7474-6110
Haley B ThigpenUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Birmingham, AL.
Fallon R LalorUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Birmingham, AL.
Omer H JamyUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Birmingham, AL.
Smith GiriUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0002-1827-5032
Andres AzueroUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0001-9883-1424
Jennifer Young PierceUniversity of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute, Mobile, AL.
Chelsea L McGowenUniversity of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute, Mobile, AL.ORCID 0000-0002-0391-4217
Casey L DanielUniversity of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute, Mobile, AL.ORCID 0000-0002-6896-1030
Courtney J AndrewsInstitute for Human Rights, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0002-6348-3201
Chao-Hui Sylvia HuangUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0002-4690-7682
J Nicholas Dionne-OdomUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0001-6764-0254
Bryan J WeinerDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Doris HowellSupportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0683-8715
Bradford E JacksonLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-0950-2907
Ethan M BaschLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-3813-9318
Angela M StoverLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-0983-686X
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUSA Mitchell Cancer Institute · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-delivered ePRO home symptom monitoring and managementR01NR019058 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ROCQUE, GABRIELLE · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR019058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite evidence of clinical benefits, widespread implementation of remote symptom monitoring has been limited. We describe a process of adapting a remote symptom monitoring intervention developed in a research setting to a real-world clinical setting at two cancer centers.

methodsThis formative evaluation assessed core components and adaptations to improve acceptability and fit of remote symptom monitoring using Stirman's Framework for Modifications and Adaptations. Implementation outcomes were evaluated in pilot studies at the two cancer centers testing technology (phase I) and workflow (phase II and III) using electronic health data; qualitative evaluation with semistructured interviews of clinical team members; and capture of field notes from clinical teams and administrators regarding barriers and recommended adaptations for future implementation.

resultsCore components of remote symptom monitoring included electronic delivery of surveys with actionable symptoms, patient education on the intervention, a system to monitor survey compliance in real time, the capacity to generate alerts, training nurses to manage alerts, and identification of personnel responsible for managing symptoms. In the pilot studies, while most patients completed > 50% of expected surveys, adaptations were identified to address barriers related to workflow challenges, patient and clinician access to technology, digital health literacy, survey fatigue, alert fatigue, and data visibility.

conclusionUsing an implementation science approach, we facilitated adaptation of remote symptom monitoring interventions from the research setting to clinical practice and identified key areas to promote effective uptake and sustainability.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresHumansPilot ProjectsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36306496
PMCPMC9750550
OpenAlexW4307585142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.