Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36306337›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2023

Baseline radiomics features and MYC rearrangement status predict progression in aggressive B-cell lymphoma.

Jakoba J Eertink, Gerben J C Zwezerijnen, Sanne E Wiegers, Simone Pieplenbosch, Martine E D Chamuleau, Pieternella J Lugtenburg, Daphne de Jong, Bauke Ylstra, Matias Mendeville, Ulrich Dührsen and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Cancers · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jakoba J EertinkDepartment of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6094-0016
Gerben J C ZwezerijnenImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9571-9362
Sanne E WiegersDepartment of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3698-8121
Simone PieplenboschImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7897-6383
Martine E D ChamuleauDepartment of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pieternella J LugtenburgDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6735-8651
Daphne de JongImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9725-4060
Bauke YlstraImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9479-3010
Matias MendevilleImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6130-1785
Ulrich DührsenDepartment of Hematology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Christine HanounDepartment of Hematology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Andreas HüttmannDepartment of Hematology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2230-3873
Julia RichterHematopathology Section, Department of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Christian-Albrecht-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Wolfram KlapperHematopathology Section, Department of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Christian-Albrecht-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7208-4117
Yvonne W S JauwDepartment of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Otto S HoekstraImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henrica C W de VetDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5454-2804
Ronald BoellaardImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Josée M ZijlstraDepartment of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1074-5922
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLCancer Center Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLGGD Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated whether the outcome prediction of patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma can be improved by combining clinical, molecular genotype, and radiomics features. MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 rearrangements were assessed using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Seventeen radiomics features were extracted from the baseline positron emission tomography-computed tomography of 323 patients, which included maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVpeak, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis, and 12 dissemination features pertaining to distance, differences in uptake and volume between lesions, respectively. Logistic regression with backward feature selection was used to predict progression after 2 years. The predictive value of (1) International Prognostic Index (IPI); (2) IPI plus MYC; (3) IPI, MYC, and MTV; (4) radiomics; and (5) MYC plus radiomics models were tested using the cross-validated area under the curve (CV-AUC) and positive predictive values (PPVs). IPI yielded a CV-AUC of 0.65 ± 0.07 with a PPV of 29.6%. The IPI plus MYC model yielded a CV-AUC of 0.68 ± 0.08. IPI, MYC, and MTV yielded a CV-AUC of 0.74 ± 0.08. The highest model performance of the radiomics model was observed for MTV combined with the maximum distance between the largest lesion and another lesion, the maximum difference in SUVpeak between 2 lesions, and the sum of distances between all lesions, yielding an improved CV-AUC of 0.77 ± 0.07. The same radiomics features were retained when adding MYC (CV-AUC, 0.77 ± 0.07). PPV was highest for the MYC plus radiomics model (50.0%) and increased by 20% compared with the IPI (29.6%). Adding radiomics features improved model performance and PPV and can, therefore, aid in identifying poor prognosis patients.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycGene RearrangementHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc

Identifiers

PMID36306337
PMCPMC9841040
OpenAlexW4307493285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.