Trial reportCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology2022
Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Acute Cardiac Resynchronization in Patients With Heart Failure.
Trial report in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04505384 (Acute Effects of Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Acute Effects of Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conduction system vs. biventricular pacing in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Pooled it
- Conduction system pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Pooled it
- Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Critical pathways in cardiology · 2026Pooled it
- Outcomes of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Heart Failure Patients: A Systematic Review.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2026Pooled it
- Long-Term Outcomes of Left Bundle-Branch Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure: The HeartSync-LBBP Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA cardiology · 2026Trial
- Optimal pace timing for left bundle branch area pacing with or without an additional LV lead: results from the CSPOT study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Left bundle branch vs biventricular pacing: mechanistic insights from a canine model.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Deterioration of Cardiac Function Complicated by Ventricular Tachycardia After the Implantation of an Artificial Cardiac Pacemaker and Upgrading to CRT-D: One Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Feasibility, safety and outcomes of contrast-free cardiac resynchronisation therapy device implantation: a retrospective cohort comparison.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
- Physiological pacing: mechanisms, clinical indications, and perspectives.European heart journal · 2025Review
- The efficacy and safety of left bundle branch pacing combined with sacubitril/valsartan or enalapril in the treatment of elderly coronary heart disease with chronic heart failure.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of Cardiac Adaptation After Device Deployment.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Impact of a Practice-wide Switch from Traditional Right Ventricular Pacing to Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2025Article
- Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Conduction System Pacing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Conduction System Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Multicenter Hemodynamic Assessment of the LOT-CRT Strategy: When Does Combining Left Bundle Branch Pacing and Coronary Venous Pacing Enhance Resynchronization?: Primary Results of the CSPOT Study.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2024Article
- Review
- Proarrhythmia with left bundle branch area pacing for complete heart block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.HeartRhythm case reports · 2024Article
- Feasibility of Single-lead Cardiac Resynchronization and Defibrillation Therapy in an Animal Model.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2024Article
- Current Role of Conduction System Pacing in Patients Requiring Permanent Pacing.Korean circulation journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeft bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as an alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP) for delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy. We sought to compare the acute improvement of electrical and mechanical synchrony, and hemodynamics between LBBP and BVP in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.
methodsLBBP and BVP were performed and compared in a crossover fashion in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation. Electrical synchrony was assessed by QRS duration and area, mechanical synchrony by the SD of time to peak velocity of 12 left ventricular segments (Ts-SD) and interventricular mechanical delay, and hemodynamics by the maximum rate of left ventricular pressure rise (dP/dt
resultsTwenty-one patient with heart failure and left bundle branch block (mean age 67±10 years, 48% male, and 90% nonischemic cause) were included. Both LBBP and BVP provided significant improvements in electrical and mechanical synchrony, and hemodynamics compared to the baseline. Compared with BVP, LBBP achieved a larger reduction in QRS duration (-11 ms [95% CI, -17 to -4 ms];
conclusionsLBBP delivers greater acute electrical and mechanical resynchronization and hemodynamic improvement than BVP in predominantly nonischemic heart failure patients with left bundle branch block. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT04505384.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.