Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36306329›Full record

Trial reportProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

NETfacts: An integrated intervention at the individual and collective level to treat communities affected by organized violence.

Katy Robjant, Sabine Schmitt, Samuel Carleial, Thomas Elbert, Liliana Abreu, Amani Chibashimba, Harald Hinkel, Anke Hoeffler, Anja C Rukundo Zeller, Brigitte Rockstroh and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katy RobjantNongovernment organization vivo international e.V., 78430 Konstanz, Germany.
Sabine SchmittNongovernment organization vivo international e.V., 78430 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5443-0079
Samuel CarleialDepartment of Psychology, Clinical and Neuropsychology, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6725-1945
Thomas ElbertNongovernment organization vivo international e.V., 78430 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1332-4939
Liliana AbreuDepartment of Politics and Administration, Development, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany.
Amani ChibashimbaNongovernment organization vivo international e.V., 78430 Konstanz, Germany.
Harald HinkelPrivate address, Kigali, Rwanda.
Anke HoefflerDepartment of Politics and Administration, Development, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany.
Anja C Rukundo ZellerNongovernment organization vivo international e.V., 78430 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2889-9164
Brigitte RockstrohNongovernment organization vivo international e.V., 78430 Konstanz, Germany.
Anke KoebachNongovernment organization vivo international e.V., 78430 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8666-9586
University of Konstanz · DEUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

War and crises affect mental health, social attitudes, and cultural norms, which can exacerbate the state of long-term insecurity. With decades of armed conflict, the Democratic Republic of Congo is one example, and violence has become normalized in civilian settings. In this study, we tested the effectiveness of the NETfacts health system, an integrated model of evidence-based individual trauma treatment (Narrative Exposure Therapy [NET]) and a trauma-informed community-based intervention (NETfacts). Alongside changes in mental health outcomes (posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, social disapproval, and shame) we also investigated change in attitudes, including rape myth acceptance, stigmatization of survivors of sexual violence, and skepticism about the reintegration of former combatants. To test whether the additional community intervention is superior to individual NET alone, we implemented a randomized controlled design with six villages and interviewed a sample of 1,066 community members. Our results demonstrate that the NETfacts health system in comparison with NET alone more effectively reduced rape myth acceptance and with it ongoing victimization and perpetration. Community members of the NETfacts group also presented with less stigmatizing attitudes against survivors of sexual violence. Skepticism about the reintegration of former combatants declined in both groups. NETfacts appears to have increased motivation to engage in individual treatment. Synergizing the healing effects of individual and collective trauma exposure, the NETfacts health system appears to be an effective and scalable approach to correct degrading or ignominious norms and restore functioning and mental health in postconflict communities.

Indexed as

RapeSex OffensesStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticHumansViolenceconflictinterventionmental healthrape mythsexual violence

Identifiers

PMID36306329
PMCPMC9636916
OpenAlexW4307475548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.