Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36306322›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Three-dimensional simulation of the pancreatic parenchyma, pancreatic duct and vascular arrangement in pancreatic surgery using a deep learning algorithm.

Ryoichi Miyamoto, Amane Takahashi, Aya Ogasawara, Toshiro Ogura, Kei Kitamura, Hiroyuki Ishida, Shinichi Matsudaira, Satoshi Nozu, Yoshiyuki Kawashima

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. 3D Modelling for Preoperative Planning, Intraoperative Navigation, and Training in Pancreatic Surgery: A Systematic Review.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Increased intestinalGut microbes reports · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryoichi MiyamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Kita-Adachi-gun, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0687-6225
Amane TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Kita-Adachi-gun, Saitama, Japan.
Aya OgasawaraImaging Technology Center, Fujifilm Corporation, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiro OguraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Kita-Adachi-gun, Saitama, Japan.
Kei KitamuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Kita-Adachi-gun, Saitama, Japan.
Hiroyuki IshidaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Kita-Adachi-gun, Saitama, Japan.
Shinichi MatsudairaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Kita-Adachi-gun, Saitama, Japan.
Satoshi NozuDepartment of Radiology, Saitama Cancer Center, Kita-Adachi-gun, Saitama, Japan.
Yoshiyuki KawashimaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Kita-Adachi-gun, Saitama, Japan.
Saitama Cancer Center · JPFujifilm (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional surgical simulation, already in use for hepatic surgery, can be used in pancreatic surgery. However, some problems still need to be overcome to achieve more precise pancreatic surgical simulation. The present study evaluates the performance of SYNAPSE VINCENT® (version 6.6, Fujifilm Medical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) in the semiautomated surgical simulation of the pancreatic parenchyma, pancreatic ducts, and peripancreatic vessels using an artificial intelligence (AI) engine designed with deep learning algorithms. One-hundred pancreatic cancer patients and a control group of 100 nonpancreatic cancer patients were enrolled. The evaluation methods for visualizing the extraction were compared using the Dice coefficient (DC). In the pancreatic cancer patients, tumor size, position, and stagewise correlations with the pancreatic parenchymal DC were analyzed. The relationship between the pancreatic duct diameter and the DC, and between the manually and AI-measured diameters of the pancreatic duct were analyzed. In the pancreatic cancer/control groups, the pancreatic parenchymal DC and pancreatic duct extraction were 0.83/0.86 and 0.84/0.77. The DC of the arteries (portal veins/veins) and associated sensitivity and specificity were 0.89/0.88 (0.89/0.88), 0.85/0.83 (0.85/0.82), and 0.82/0.81 (0.84/0.81), respectively. No correlations were observed between pancreatic parenchymal DC and tumor size, position, or stage. No correlation was observed between the pancreatic duct diameter and the DC. A positive correlation (r = 0.61, p<0.001) was observed between the manually and AI-measured diameters of the pancreatic duct. Extraction of the pancreatic parenchyma, pancreatic duct, and surrounding vessels with the SYNAPSE VINCENT® AI engine assumed to be useful as surgical simulation.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPancreatic NeoplasmsAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansPancreatic Ducts

Identifiers

PMID36306322
PMCPMC9616217
OpenAlexW4307475642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.