Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36306100›Full record

ArticleDermatology and therapy2022

Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: Challenges and Perspectives.

Konstantinos Liopyris, Stamatios Gregoriou, Julia Dias, Alexandros J Stratigos

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Current research landscape and future prospects of in silico modeling approaches for atopic dermatitis.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. DermIDS: Dermatology imaging data structure for scalable and interoperable AI systems.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Konstantinos Liopyris1st Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Andreas Sygros Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 5 Ionos Dragoumi Str, 16121, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9566-8238
Stamatios Gregoriou1st Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Andreas Sygros Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 5 Ionos Dragoumi Str, 16121, Athens, Greece. stamgreg@yahoo.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7585-1032
Julia Dias1st Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Andreas Sygros Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 5 Ionos Dragoumi Str, 16121, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5804-8830
Alexandros J Stratigos1st Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Andreas Sygros Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 5 Ionos Dragoumi Str, 16121, Athens, Greece.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) based on machine learning and convolutional neuron networks (CNN) is rapidly becoming a realistic prospect in dermatology. Non-melanoma skin cancer is the most common cancer worldwide and melanoma is one of the deadliest forms of cancer. Dermoscopy has improved physicians' diagnostic accuracy for skin cancer recognition but unfortunately it remains comparatively low. AI could provide invaluable aid in the early evaluation and diagnosis of skin cancer. In the last decade, there has been a breakthrough in new research and publications in the field of AI. Studies have shown that CNN algorithms can classify skin lesions from dermoscopic images with superior or at least equivalent performance compared to clinicians. Even though AI algorithms have shown very promising results for the diagnosis of skin cancer in reader studies, their generalizability and applicability in everyday clinical practice remain elusive. Herein we attempted to summarize the potential pitfalls and challenges of AI that were underlined in reader studies and pinpoint strategies to overcome limitations in future studies. Finally, we tried to analyze the advantages and opportunities that lay ahead for a better future for dermatology and patients, with the potential use of AI in our practices.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDermoscopyDiagnosisMachine learningMelanomaPreventionSkin cancerTeledermatology

Identifiers

PMID36306100
PMCPMC9674813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.