Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36306097›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Magnetic Resonance Current Density Imaging (MR-CDI).

Saurav Z K Sajib, Rosalind Sadleir

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saurav Z K SajibSchool of Biological Health System Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA. ssajib1@asu.edu.
Rosalind SadleirSchool of Biological Health System Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current density imaging (CDI) was developed with the aim of determining the three-dimensional distribution of externally applied electric current pathways inside a conductive medium, using measurements of magnetic flux density [Formula: see text] data. While the B field may be measurable using instruments such as a magnetometer, in magnetic resonance current density imaging (MR-CDI), an MRI scanner is used to measure the magnetic flux density data induced by current flow. In MR-CDI, the object must be rotated inside the MRI machine to find all three components of the B-field, as only the component of B parallel to the magnet main magnetic field can be measured. In principle, once the all three components of the B field have been obtained from an MR imaging experiment, the current density distribution [Formula: see text] can be reconstructed from Ampere's law [Formula: see text]. However, the need to rotate the object within the MRI scanner limits the usability of this technique. To overcome this problem, researchers have investigated the current density reconstruction problem using only one component of the magnetic flux density B

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingElectric ConductivityElectric ImpedanceMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPhantoms, Imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.