ArticleAnimal cognition2023
Paradoxical choice and the reinforcing value of information.
Article in Animal cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic salience as a basis for behavioural meta-malleability.Royal Society open science · 2026Review
- Representations of the intrinsic value of information in mouse orbitofrontal cortex.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Why do we seek information about the future? On the origins of subjective value without instrumental value.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- GoFish: a foray into open-source, aquatic behavioral automation.Journal of fish biology · 2025Article
- Do goldfish like to be informed?Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- To know or not to know? Curiosity and the value of prospective information in animals.Learning & behavior · 2025Review
- A Common Stay-on-Goal Mechanism in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex for Information and Effort Choices.eNeuro · 2025Article
- Temporal context effects on suboptimal choice.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- Probing Perceptual Uncertainty to Examine the Relationship between Curiosity and Confidence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Learning to Choose: Behavioral Dynamics Underlying the Initial Acquisition of Decision-Making.eNeuro · 2024Article
- A special role for anterior cingulate cortex, but not orbitofrontal cortex or basolateral amygdala, in choices involving information.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Learning to Choose: Behavioral Dynamics Underlying the Initial Acquisition of Decision Making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- On the value of advanced information about delayed rewards.Animal cognition · 2024Article
- Animal affect, welfare and the Bayesian brain.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2024Review
- Inhibition and paradoxical choice.Learning & behavior · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Signals that reduce uncertainty can be valuable because well-informed decision-makers can better align their preferences to opportunities. However, some birds and mammals display an appetite for informative signals that cannot be used to increase returns. We explore the role that reward-predictive stimuli have in fostering such preferences, aiming at distinguishing between two putative underlying mechanisms. The 'information hypothesis' proposes that reducing uncertainty is reinforcing per se, somewhat consistently with the concept of curiosity: a motivation to know in the absence of tractable extrinsic benefits. In contrast, the 'conditioned reinforcement hypothesis', an associative account, proposes asymmetries in secondarily acquired reinforcement: post-choice stimuli announcing forthcoming rewards (S
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.