ArticleEuropean radiology2023
An alternative method to evaluate lumbar interbody fusion status focusing on position change of screw-rod constructs.
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Initial appearance and temporal distribution of pedicle screw loosening after single-level lumbar interbody fusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion status is generally subjective and may differ among raters. The authors examined whether the assessment of position change of screw-rod constructs could be an alternative method for the evaluation of fusion status.
methodsSixty-three patients undergoing lumbar interbody single-level fusion were retrospectively reviewed. Three-dimensional images of screw-rod constructs were created from baseline CT examination on the day after surgery and follow-up CT examinations (3-5 months, 6-11 months, and ≥ 12 months) and superposed, with position change of screw-rod constructs being evaluated by the distance between the 3-dimensional images at baseline and follow-up. The evaluation was repeated twice to confirm the reproducibility. Fusion status on follow-up CT examinations was assessed by three raters, where inter-rater reliability was evaluated with Fleiss' kappa. The results of the fusion status were classified into fusion and incomplete fusion groups in each timing of follow-up CT examinations, where the amount of position change was compared between the two groups.
resultsThe evaluation of position change was completely reproducible. The Fleiss' kappa (agreements) was 0.481 (69.4%). The medians of the amount of position change in fusion and incomplete fusion groups were 0.134 mm and 0.158 mm at 3-5 months (p = 0.21), 0.160 mm and 0.190 mm at 6-11 months (p = 0.02), and 0.156 mm and 0.314 mm at ≥ 12 months (p = 0.004).
conclusionsThe assessment of position change of screw-rod constructs at 6 months or more after surgery can be an alternative method for evaluating lumbar interbody fusion status. KEY POINTS: • Lumbar interbody fusion status (satisfactory, incomplete, or failed) is associated with the quantification of position change of screw-rod in this study. • Reference values for the evaluation of position change in identifying interbody fusion status are provided. • Position change of screw-rod could be a supportive method for evaluating interbody fusion status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.