Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36305841›Full record

ReviewCA: a cancer journal for clinicians2023

Consensuses, controversies, and future directions in treatment deintensification for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer.

Jung Julie Kang, Yao Yu, Linda Chen, Kaveh Zakeri, Daphna Yael Gelblum, Sean Matthew McBride, Nadeem Riaz, C Jillian Tsai, Anuja Kriplani, Tony K W Hung and 10 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Hypoxia-Directed Treatment of Human Papillomavirus-Related Oropharyngeal Carcinoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Transoral robotic surgery in head and neck cancer: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Current application and future development trends of robotic head and neck surgery].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jung Julie KangDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9773-5481
Yao YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Linda ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Kaveh ZakeriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Daphna Yael GelblumDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Sean Matthew McBrideDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Nadeem RiazDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
C Jillian TsaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Anuja KriplaniDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Tony K W HungDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
James V FettenDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Lara A DunnDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Alan L HoDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Jay O BoyleDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Ian S GanlyDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Bhuvanesh SinghDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Eric J ShermanDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
David G PfisterDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Richard J WongDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Nancy Y LeeDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USYale University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most common cancer caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in the United States is oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), and its incidence has been rising since the turn of the century. Because of substantial long-term morbidities with chemoradiation and the favorable prognosis of HPV-positive OPC, identifying the optimal deintensification strategy for this group has been a keystone of academic head-and-neck surgery, radiation oncology, and medical oncology for over the past decade. However, the first generation of randomized chemotherapy deintensification trials failed to change the standard of care, triggering concern over the feasibility of de-escalation. National database studies estimate that up to one third of patients receive nonstandard de-escalated treatments, which have subspecialty-specific nuances. A synthesis of the multidisciplinary deintensification data and current treatment standards is important for the oncology community to reinforce best practices and ensure optimal patient outcomes. In this review, the authors present a summary and comparison of prospective HPV-positive OPC de-escalation trials. Chemotherapy attenuation compromises outcomes without reducing toxicity. Limited data comparing transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with radiation raise concern over toxicity and outcomes with TORS. There are promising data to support de-escalating adjuvant therapy after TORS, but consensus on treatment indications is needed. Encouraging radiation deintensification strategies have been reported (upfront dose reduction and induction chemotherapy-based patient selection), but level I evidence is years away. Ultimately, stage and HPV status may be insufficient to guide de-escalation. The future of deintensification may lie in incorporating intratreatment response assessments to harness the powers of personalized medicine and integrate real-time surveillance.

Indexed as

Oropharyngeal NeoplasmsPapillomavirus InfectionsConsensusHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansProspective Studieschemotherapydeintensificationhuman papillomavirusoral and oropharyngeal neoplasmsradiation oncology

Identifiers

PMID36305841
PMCPMC9992119
OpenAlexW4307498307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.