ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2022
Molecular determinants of TRAF6 binding specificity suggest that native interaction partners are not optimized for affinity.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- ZDHHC17-Mediated CDK4 Palmitoylation Drives Cell Cycle Progression and Orchestrates Cancer Immune Surveillance.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- The Vulnerable Vascular Network: Endothelial Dysfunction as a Central Driver of Intestinal Inflammation-A Systematic Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- PairK: Pairwise k-mer alignment for quantifying protein motif conservation in disordered regions.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- PairK: Pairwise k-mer alignment for quantifying protein motif conservation in disordered regions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Molecular determinants of TRAF6 binding specificity suggest that native interaction partners are not optimized for affinity.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
TRAF6 is an adaptor protein involved in signaling pathways that are essential for development and the immune system. It participates in many protein-protein interactions, some of which are mediated by the C-terminal MATH domain, which binds to short peptide segments containing the motif PxExx[FYWHDE], where x is any amino acid. Blocking MATH domain interactions is associated with favorable effects in various disease models. To better define TRAF6 MATH domain binding preferences, we screened a combinatorial library using bacterial cell-surface peptide display. We identified 236 of the best TRAF6-interacting peptides and a set of 1,200 peptides that match the sequence PxE but do not bind TRAF6 MATH. The peptides that were most enriched in the screen bound TRAF6 tighter than previously measured native peptides. To better understand the structural basis for TRAF6 interaction preferences, we built all-atom structural models of the MATH domain in complex with high-affinity binders and nonbinders identified in the screen. We identified favorable interactions for motif features in binders as well as negative design elements distributed across the motif that can disfavor or preclude binding. Searching the human proteome revealed that the most biologically relevant TRAF6 motif matches occupy a different sequence space from the best hits discovered in combinatorial library screening, suggesting that native interactions are not optimized for affinity. Our experimentally determined binding preferences and structural models support the design of peptide-based interaction inhibitors with higher affinities than endogenous TRAF6 ligands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.