Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36305763›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2022

Intrinsic protein disorder uncouples affinity from binding specificity.

Tamas Lazar, Agnes Tantos, Peter Tompa, Eva Schad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Engineering Protein-Polyelectrolyte Interactions for Cellular Applications.Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Comment on "Intrinsic protein disorder uncouples affinity from binding specificity".Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  13. Reply to "Intrinsic protein disorder uncouples affinity from binding specificity".Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Intrinsic protein disorder uncouples affinity from binding specificity.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tamas LazarVIB-VUB Center for Structural Biology, Flanders Institute for Biotechnology (VIB), Brussels, Belgium.
Agnes TantosInstitute of Enzymology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Peter TompaVIB-VUB Center for Structural Biology, Flanders Institute for Biotechnology (VIB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8042-9939
Eva SchadInstitute of Enzymology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-3006-2910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) of proteins often function by molecular recognition, in which they undergo induced folding. Based on prior generalizations, the idea prevails in the IDP field that due to the entropic penalty of induced folding, the major functional advantage associated with this binding mode is "uncoupling" specificity from binding strength. Nevertheless, both weaker binding and high specificity of IDPs/IDRs rest on limited experimental observations, making these assumptions more speculations than evidence-supported facts. The issue is also complicated by the rather vague concept of specificity that lacks an exact measure, such as the K

Indexed as

Intrinsically Disordered ProteinsProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein FoldingIntrinsically Disordered Proteinsbinding strengthconservationdisordered protein complexesIDPsspecificitystructural disorder

Identifiers

PMID36305763
PMCPMC9601785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.