Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36305674›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2022

Underwater hearing in sea ducks with applications for reducing gillnet bycatch through acoustic deterrence.

Kathleen A McGrew, Sarah E Crowell, Jonathan L Fiely, Alicia M Berlin, Glenn H Olsen, Jennifer James, Heather Hopkins, Christopher K Williams

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen A McGrewVirginia Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, 205 Duck Pond Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0125-5198
Sarah E CrowellUS Geological Survey, Eastern Ecological Science Center, 12100 Beech Forest Road, Laurel, MD 20708, USA.
Jonathan L FielyUS Geological Survey, Eastern Ecological Science Center, 12100 Beech Forest Road, Laurel, MD 20708, USA.
Alicia M BerlinUS Geological Survey, Eastern Ecological Science Center, 12100 Beech Forest Road, Laurel, MD 20708, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5275-3077
Glenn H OlsenUS Geological Survey, Eastern Ecological Science Center, 12100 Beech Forest Road, Laurel, MD 20708, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7188-6203
Jennifer JamesDepartment of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, 531 South College Ave, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Heather HopkinsDepartment of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, 531 South College Ave, Newark, DE 19716, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3009-1690
Christopher K WilliamsNaval Undersea Warfare Center, Newport Division, Mission Environmental Planning, 1176 Howell St, Newport, RI 02841, USA.
United States Geological Survey · USNaval Undersea Warfare Center · US

Funding

Friends of PatuxentNational Institute of Deafness and Communicative DisordersNIH HHSUnited States Fish and Wildlife ServiceUnited States Geological Survey Eastern Ecological Science CenterUnited States NavyUniversity of Delaware
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As diving foragers, sea ducks are vulnerable to underwater anthropogenic activity, including ships, underwater construction, seismic surveys and gillnet fisheries. Bycatch in gillnets is a contributing source of mortality for sea ducks, killing hundreds of thousands of individuals annually. We researched underwater hearing in sea duck species to increase knowledge of underwater avian acoustic sensitivity and to assist with possible development of gillnet bycatch mitigation strategies that include auditory deterrent devices. We used both psychoacoustic and electrophysiological techniques to investigate underwater duck hearing in several species including the long-tailed duck (Clangula hyemalis), surf scoter (Melanitta perspicillata) and common eider (Somateria mollissima). Psychoacoustic results demonstrated that all species tested share a common range of maximum auditory sensitivity of 1.0-3.0 kHz, with the long-tailed ducks and common eiders at the high end of that range (2.96 kHz), and surf scoters at the low end (1.0 kHz). In addition, our electrophysiological results from 4 surf scoters and 2 long-tailed ducks, while only tested at 0.5, 1 and 2 kHz, generally agree with the audiogram shape from our psychoacoustic testing. The results from this study are applicable to the development of effective acoustic deterrent devices or pingers in the 2-3 kHz range to deter sea ducks from anthropogenic threats.

Indexed as

DucksFisheriesAcousticsAnimalsHearingHumansAnthropogenicAuditoryCommon eiderLong-tailed duckNoise pollutionPsychoacousticsSeabirdSoundSurf scoter

Identifiers

PMID36305674
PMCPMC10658911
OpenAlexW4307460222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.