Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36305610›Full record

ReviewInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

A Comprehensive Review and Bifactor Modeling Analysis of the Brief COPE.

Filipe Rodrigues, Nuno Figueiredo, José Rodrigues, Regina Ferreira, Antonio Hernández-Mendo, Diogo Monteiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Nation Veering off Course: Implications for Efficacy and Well-Being.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Nicotine Withdrawal Symptoms.International journal of mental health and addiction · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Coping Strategies and Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Testing the Associations between Coping, Mental Health, and Satisfaction with Life in Portuguese Workers.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Filipe RodriguesESECS - Polytechnique of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
Nuno FigueiredoESECS - Polytechnique of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2795-1557
José RodriguesLife Quality Research Centre, Rio Maior, Portugal.
Regina FerreiraLife Quality Research Centre, Rio Maior, Portugal.
Antonio Hernández-MendoUniversity of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Diogo MonteiroESECS - Polytechnique of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Brief COPE is a measure of coping strategies that contains 14 factors. The purpose of this research was twofold: (a) examine the psychometric proprieties of the Brief Cope in previous studies; and (b) perform Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) with second-order model and bifactor model specifications that could be used to assess the best model that represents the 14 coping strategies inherent to the instrument. In order to meet the first objective, a bibliographic review of published peer-reviewed studies between 1997 and 2021 was conducted. Results from the review identified 50 studies, of which 21 used exploratory factor analysis, 28 CFA and one study test-retest analysis. Seventeen studies used the entire correlated 14-factor structure. However, only 11 studies conducted a CFA. For the second objective, a sample of 472 working class individuals (female = 278) with a mean work experience of 19.06 years (SD = 11,92) were recruited. We tested several model specifications, convergent and discriminant validity analysis. We found the correlated 14-factor structure of the Brief COPE to have good psychometric properties. The second-order and bifactor model specifications displayed poor fit or did not converge, respectively. The measure showed good convergent and discriminant validity, and the subscales showed adequate internal consistency. We provide further validity and reliability of the correlated 14-factor structure, evidencing that this measure can assess coping mechanisms. Second-order model specifications need further testing and empirical evidence to support such hierarchical categorization.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesbifactor modelingcopemental healthpsychometricsreview

Identifiers

PMID36305610
PMCPMC9619253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.