ArticleThoracic cancer2022
Distinct clinicopathological characteristics, genomic alteration and prognosis in breast cancer with concurrent TP53 mutation and MYC amplification.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumor genomics in patients younger than 40 years of age with metastatic breast cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Selected Pathological Criteria That Predict Low Rates of Axillary Lymph Node Metastases Regardless of Patient Age: A Single Institution Study.The breast journal · 2026Article
- Hsa-circVIM regulates breast cancer tumor progression and tamoxifen sensitivity by sponging miR-1294 in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer cells.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Acquired resistance to immunotherapy and chemoradiation in MYC amplified head and neck cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- Landscape of Genetic Mutations in Appendiceal Cancers.Cancers · 2023Review
- Distinct clinicopathological characteristics, genomic alteration and prognosis in breast cancer with concurrent TP53 mutation and MYC amplification.Thoracic cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBoth TP53 mutation and MYC amplification indicate poor outcomes in breast cancer (BC), but the clinical values of concurrent TP53 and MYC alterations have not been well-characterized.
methodsA total of 494 BC patients diagnosed at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (GDPH) were retrospectively analyzed. Genomic alterations were determined using next-generation sequencing. Survival analysis was applied to assess the effects of genetic alterations on relapse-free survival. The prognosis was verified based on 1405 patients from METABRIC cohort. Additionally, we used logistic regression to identify the factors associated with pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
resultsIn GDPH cohort, patients with TP53/MYC co-alteration exhibited higher grade and stage, more positive HER2 status and higher Ki67 levels, but less luminal A subtypes. They also had more mutations in genes involved in ERBB and TGF-β signaling pathways, as well as exclusive FANCG/CDKN2B/QKI copy number amplifications and SUFU/HIST3H3/ERCC4/JUN/BCR mutations. Concurrent TP53 and MYC alterations independently increased hazards of relapse (HR, 5.425; 95% CI: 2.019-14.579; p < 0.001). They maintained independent significance for relapse-free (HR, 1.310; 95% CI: 1.012-1.697; p = 0.041) and overall survival (HR, 1.373; 95% CI: 1.093-1.725; p = 0.006) in METABRIC cohort. Among the 81 patients receiving chemotherapy, TP53 mutation (OR, 5.750; 95% CI: 1.553-25.776; p = 0.013) and earlier stage (OR, 0.275; 95% CI 0.088-0.788; p = 0.020) were associated with pCR, while the co-alteration did not serve as an independent predictor (p = 0.199).
conclusionsTP53/MYC co-alteration was associated with distinct clinicopathological and genomic features. They also conferred unfavorable prognosis in BC patients, and did not improve pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.