Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36304919›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

Quantum-based machine learning and AI models to generate force field parameters for drug-like small molecules.

Sathish Kumar Mudedla, Abdennour Braka, Sangwook Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sathish Kumar MudedlaR&D Center, PharmCADD, Busan, South Korea.
Abdennour BrakaR&D Center, PharmCADD, Busan, South Korea.
Sangwook WuR&D Center, PharmCADD, Busan, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Force fields for drug-like small molecules play an essential role in molecular dynamics simulations and binding free energy calculations. In particular, the accurate generation of partial charges on small molecules is critical to understanding the interactions between proteins and drug-like molecules. However, it is a time-consuming process. Thus, we generated a force field for small molecules and employed a machine learning (ML) model to rapidly predict partial charges on molecules in less than a minute of time. We performed density functional theory (DFT) calculation for 31770 small molecules that covered the chemical space of drug-like molecules. The partial charges for the atoms in a molecule were predicted using an ML model trained on DFT-based atomic charges. The predicted values were comparable to the charges obtained from DFT calculations. The ML model showed high accuracy in the prediction of atomic charges for external test data sets. We also developed neural network (NN) models to assign atom types, phase angles and periodicities. All the models performed with high accuracy on test data sets. Our code calculated all the descriptors that were needed for the prediction of force field parameters and produced topologies for small molecules by combining results from ML and NN models. To assess the accuracy of the predicted force field parameters, we calculated solvation free energies for small molecules, and the results were in close agreement with experimental free energies. The AI-generated force field was effective in the fast and accurate generation of partial charges and other force field parameters for small drug-like molecules.

Indexed as

AI force fieldatomic chargesatomtype predictionfree energypartial charge predictionprotein ligand binding

Identifiers

PMID36304919
PMCPMC9592901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.