Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36304812›Full record

ArticleActa clinica Croatica2022

VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT - SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE.

Ivan Jurić, Višnja Nesek Adam

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ivan JurićDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Sveti Duh, Zagreb, Croatia.
Višnja Nesek AdamDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Sveti Duh, Zagreb, Croatia.
Klinička bolnica "Sveti Duh" · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the importance of early recognition of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the nonspecificity of its symptoms and signs, it is essential to follow the guidelines for diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Ultrasound examination of the entire lower extremity is currently the standard diagnostic method for symptomatic patients with a clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) according to the Wells scoring system. The aim of this study is to show the demographic structure and analyze the number of patients in the emergency department with suspected venous thrombosis. In the past 10 years, 2,022 patients with DVT and 686 with pulmonary emboli have been diagnosed. Despite adherence to the diagnostic protocol, nearly two-thirds of patients require early ultrasound diagnosis. One-fifth of patients had thrombosis of the superficial venous system of the leg or arm. Thrombus was present in the veins of the lower leg in 37% of patients with DVT. The presence of thrombi above the knee, involving the deep femoropopliteal venous system, was found in as much as one-third of patients. These findings and current guidelines suggest that there is a paradigm shift toward more frequent use of DOAC in patients with DVT. However, greater educational efforts may be needed for many physicians to become comfortable with the use of DOAC in the outpatient management of patient populations at low risk for pulmonary embolism.

Indexed as

Pulmonary EmbolismVenous ThromboembolismVenous ThrombosisEmergency Service, HospitalHumansLegemergency medicinepulmonary embolismvenotromboembolismvenous thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID36304812
PMCPMC9536161
OpenAlexW4307772449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.