Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36304759›Full record

ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2022

Drug Survival Outcomes Associated with the Real-World Use of Ixekizumab, Secukinumab, Guselkumab, and Adalimumab for the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis in China: A 52-Week Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Ying Li, Jia-Jing Lu, Xiao-Yuan Zhong, Ying-Yuan Yu, Ning Yu, Yu Wang, Xue-Mei Yi, Yang-Feng Ding, Yu-Ling Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ying Li *Department of Dermatology, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jia-Jing Lu *Department of Dermatology, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Yuan Zhong *Department of Dermatology, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Ying-Yuan Yu *Department of Dermatology, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Ning YuDepartment of Dermatology, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yu WangDepartment of Dermatology, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xue-Mei YiDepartment of Dermatology, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yang-Feng DingDepartment of Dermatology, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yu-Ling ShiDepartment of Dermatology, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-1273-7881

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Data pertaining to biologic agents used for treating psoriasis in real-world settings are lacking at present. To compare drug survival at 52 weeks for a range of biologics used to treat psoriasis under real-world conditions. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study of a cohort of patients diagnosed with plaque psoriasis treated using ixekizumab, secukinumab, guselkumab, or adalimumab between January 2020 and December 2021. Baseline demographic characteristics, duration of psoriasis, and prior biological treatments for all patients were recorded. Drug survival rates were analyzed in different patient groups using Kaplan-Meier curves and Log rank tests. Results: In total, this study included 386 plaque psoriasis patients, of whom 70, 175, 36, and 105 were, respectively, treated using ixekizumab, secukinumab, guselkumab, and adalimumab. Over a 52-week period, the overall cumulative drug survival rates for ixekizumab, secukinumab, guselkumab, and adalimumab were 67.1%, 63.0%, 72.2%, and 37.1%, respectively. Lack of efficacy was the primary cause of discontinuation for these biologic therapies, followed by economic burden and adverse event incidence. Conclusion: These results suggest that guselkumab exhibited superior drug survival, drug survival outcomes for ixekizumab and secukinumab were comparable, and significantly better than those of adalimumab in China. Preventing a loss of drug efficacy represents a primary approach to improving biologic drug survival in psoriasis patients.

Indexed as

adalimumabbiologicsdrug survivalguselkumabixekizumabpsoriasisreal-worldsecukinumab

Identifiers

PMID36304759
PMCPMC9592732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.