Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36304739›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Classification of Marine Mammals Using the Trained Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network with the Whale Algorithm Developed with the Fuzzy System.

Ali Hosseini Nejad Takhti, Abbas Saffari, Diego Martín, Mohammad Khishe, Mokhtar Mohammadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ali Hosseini Nejad TakhtiDepartment of Information Technology, College of Engineering and Computer Science, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8475-041X
Abbas SaffariDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Imam Khomeini Marine Science University, Nowshahr, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6679-7225
Diego MartínETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Complutense 30, Madrid 28040, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8810-0695
Mohammad KhisheDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Imam Khomeini Marine Science University, Nowshahr, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1024-8822
Mokhtar MohammadiDepartment of Information Technology, College of Engineering and Computer Science, Lebanese French University, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1393-5062

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The existence of various sounds from different natural and unnatural sources in the deep sea has caused the classification and identification of marine mammals intending to identify different endangered species to become one of the topics of interest for researchers and activist fields. In this paper, first, an experimental data set was created using a designed scenario. The whale optimization algorithm (WOA) is then used to train the multilayer perceptron neural network (MLP-NN). However, due to the large size of the data, the algorithm has not determined a clear boundary between the exploration and extraction phases. Next, to support this shortcoming, the fuzzy inference is used as a new approach to developing and upgrading WOA called FWOA. Fuzzy inference by setting FWOA control parameters can well define the boundary between the two phases of exploration and extraction. To measure the performance of the designed categorizer, in addition to using it to categorize benchmark datasets, five benchmarking algorithms CVOA, WOA, ChOA, BWO, and PGO were also used for MLPNN training. The measured criteria are concurrency speed, ability to avoid local optimization, and the classification rate. The simulation results on the obtained data set showed that, respectively, the classification rate in MLPFWOA, MLP-CVOA, MLP-WOA, MLP-ChOA, MLP-BWO, and MLP-PGO classifiers is equal to 94.98, 92.80, 91.34, 90.24, 89.04, and 88.10. As a result, MLP-FWOA performed better than other algorithms.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerWhalesAlgorithmsAnimalsComputer Simulation

Identifiers

PMID36304739
PMCPMC9596276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.