Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36304644›Full record

ArticleIndian dermatology online journal

Rituximab in Pemphigus - An Observational Study from a Tertiary Care Center of North India.

Iffat Hassan, Fozia Rehman, Sheikh Javeed Sultan, Aaqib Aslam, Irfan Tasaduq, Saika Reyaz

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian dermatology online journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iffat HassanDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Government Medical College, Karan Nagar, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Fozia RehmanDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Government Medical College, Karan Nagar, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Sheikh Javeed SultanDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Government Medical College, Karan Nagar, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Aaqib AslamDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Government Medical College, Karan Nagar, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Irfan TasaduqDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Government Medical College, Karan Nagar, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Saika ReyazDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Government Medical College, Karan Nagar, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Government Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pemphigus is a group of potentially fatal autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases. Rituximab (RTX) is a chimeric anti-CD20 (anti-cluster of differentiate 20) monoclonal antibody being increasingly used and becoming the first-line therapy in the management of pemphigus. Aims and Objectives: This was an observational study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) who either did not respond or relapsed after conventional therapeutic regimens and in treatment naive pemphigus patients. Materials and Methods: The study included pemphigus patients coming to our immunobullous clinic who did not respond to conventional therapy or relapsed after receiving conventional therapy as well as fresh cases between January 2019 and October 2021. All enrolled patients received two doses of rituximab (1 gram in each) as intravenous infusions two weeks apart as per the rheumatoid arthritis protocol. The efficacy and safety were evaluated by assessing pemphigus area and activity score (PAAS) before and after the therapy, clinical response, and any adverse events during follow-up. Results: Sixteen (ten males and six females) patients were included in the study. The age of these patients ranged from 27 to 60 years, with a mean of 43.8 ± 9.8 years. There were 15 (93.75%) patients with PV (14 mucocutaneous type and 01 mucosal) and one (6.25%) with pemphigus foliaceus. Among these patients, nine (56.25%) were relapse cases, four (25%) were non-responders, and three (18.75%) were fresh cases who received rituximab as first-line therapy. Fourteen (87.5%) patients reached complete remission off therapy over a median time of 6.36 months (ranging from 18 weeks to 35 weeks). Rituximab was well-tolerated by our patients, and no serious adverse events were observed. The main limitation of our study was the small sample size and the lack of a comparison group. Conclusion: Rituximab is a safe and effective treatment for pemphigus.

Indexed as

Autoimmunefoliaceuspemphigusrituximabvulgaris

Identifiers

PMID36304644
PMCPMC9595168
OpenAlexW4297723280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.