Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36304604›Full record

ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2022

An analysis of physician reviews in relation to quality and social media presence.

Yissela Escobedo, Shirley Reed, Sarah Payne, Jinmei Liu, Melissa Navar, Robert J Widmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yissela EscobedoDepartment of Cardiology, Baylor Scott and White Medical Center - Temple, Temple, Texas.
Shirley ReedDepartment of Internal Medicine, Baylor Scott and White Medical Center - Temple, Temple, Texas.
Sarah PayneDepartment of Cardiology, Baylor Scott and White Medical Center - Temple, Temple, Texas.
Jinmei LiuDepartment of System Analytics and Survey Operations, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Melissa NavarDepartment of System Analytics and Survey Operations, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Robert J WidmerDepartment of Cardiology, Baylor Scott and White Medical Center - Temple, Temple, Texas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3063-5651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Press Ganey patient engagement survey scores are used among health care facilities throughout the US to evaluate patients' perception of the quality of care provided. The relation of Press Ganey score to primary quality metrics has not been reported before; thus, we studied it in a cohort of Baylor Scott and White Health primary care physicians. Using simple linear regression, we evaluated Press Ganey scores and compared them with primary care quality metrics associated with improved patient outcomes, including cancer screening, depression screening, blood pressure, and glucose control, in addition to well-child visits. We found that overall quality had a very low linear correlation with Press Ganey survey items, and high-quality performance and increased number of practice years had an overall positive correlation with high survey ratings. We also found that social media presence or total website activity was not an important feature in predicting the top 25 quality performers within the health care system.

Indexed as

Patient satisfactionpatient surveyPress Ganeyquality metricssocial media

Identifiers

PMID36304604
PMCPMC9586681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.