ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022
Perspectives before incremental trans-disciplinary cross-validation of clinical self-evaluation tools and functional MRI in psychiatry: 10 years later.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating EEG and fMRI in naturalistic paradigms: Advances in understanding mental disorders-a decade study in review (2014-2024).Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2026Review
- Ecologically-Valid Emotion Signatures Enhance Mood Disorder Diagnostics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Association between Cortical Gyrification and Major Depression: Clinical Correlates.Psychopathology · 2026Article
- Towards New Methodology for Cross-Validation of Clinical Evaluation Scales and Functional MRI in Psychiatry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Mapping the landscape: a bibliometric analysis of resting-state fMRI research on schizophrenia over the past 25 years.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging study of group independent components underpinning item responses to paranoid-depressive scale.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- Cognitive biases as an adaptive strategy in autism and schizophrenia spectrum: the compensation perspective on neurodiversity.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Review
- Kinesthesia and Temporal Experience: On the 'Knitting and Unknitting' Process of Bodily Subjectivity in Schizophrenia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Translational validity (or trans-disciplinary validity) is defined as one possible approach to achieving incremental validity by combining simultaneous clinical state-dependent measures and functional MRI data acquisition. It is designed under the assumption that the simultaneous administration of the two methods may produce a dataset with enhanced synchronization and concordance. Translational validation aims at "bridging" the explanatory gap by implementing validated psychometric tools clinically in the experimental settings of fMRI and then translating them back to clinical utility. Our studies may have identified common diagnostic task-specific denominators in terms of activations and network modulation. However, those common denominators need further investigation to determine whether they signify disease or syndrome-specific features (signatures), which, at the end of the day, raises one more question about the poverty of current conventional psychiatric classification criteria. We propose herewith a novel algorithm for translational validation based on our explorative findings. The algorithm itself includes pre-selection of a test based on its psychometric characteristics, adaptation to the functional MRI paradigm, exploration of the underpinning whole brain neural correlates in healthy controls as compared to a patient population with certain diagnoses, and finally, investigation of the differences between two or more diagnostic classes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.