Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36304532›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Significant advantages for first line treatment with TNF-alpha inhibitors in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease - Data from the multicenter CEDATA-GPGE registry study.

Merle Claßen, Jan de Laffolie, Martin Claßen, Alexander Schnell, Keywan Sohrabi, André Hoerning

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06606756 (CEDATA GPGE Patient Registry for Children and Adolescents With IBD), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06606756 recruitingnot on this map

CEDATA GPGE Patient Registry for Children and Adolescents With IBD

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of GiessenRan2004 to 2034Enrolled6,300ConditionsInflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)ArmsPatient Registry without intervention, Digital Registry and Feedback on clinical data
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Merle ClaßenClinic for Children and Adolescent Medicine, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Jan de LaffolieAbteilung für Allgemeine Pädiatrie und Neonatologie, Justus Liebig University Gießen, Gießen, Germany.
Martin ClaßenKlinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany.
Alexander SchnellClinic for Children and Adolescent Medicine, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Keywan SohrabiAbteilung für Allgemeine Pädiatrie und Neonatologie, Justus Liebig University Gießen, Gießen, Germany.
André HoerningClinic for Children and Adolescent Medicine, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: In recent years, biological agents, such as anti-TNF-α blockers, have been introduced and have shown efficacy in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Here, the prescription mode differentiated into a first/second line application, and efficacy and side effects are evaluated beginning from 2004 until today. Methods: Statistical analyses of the prospective and ongoing CEDATA multicenter registry data from the Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (GPGE) were performed for patients receiving a biological agent at least once during the period from June 2004 until November 2020 ( Results: Crohn's disease (CD) was present in 71.5% of patients, and 52% were boys. Patients showed high disease activity when receiving a first-line TNF-α blocker. After 2016, patients who failed to respond to anti-TNF-α induction therapy were treated with off-label biologics (vedolizumab 4.3% and ustekinumab 2.1%). Propensity score matching indicated that patients with CD and higher disease activity benefitted significantly more from early anti-TNF-α therapy. This assessment was based on a clinical evaluation and lab parameters related to inflammation compared to delayed second-line treatment. Additionally, first-line treatment resulted in less treatment failure and fewer extraintestinal manifestations during TNF-α blockade. Conclusion: First-line treatment with anti-TNF-α drugs is effective and safe. An earlier start significantly reduces the risk of treatment failure and is associated with fewer extraintestinal manifestations during longitudinal follow-up.

Indexed as

anti-TNF-α inhibitor therapyCrohn’s diseasefirst-line therapypediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)ulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID36304532
PMCPMC9595023
OpenAlexW4307584300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.