Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36304522›Full record

ArticleLeukemia research reports2022

Patients with AML-MRC benefit from decitabine in combination with low-dose G-CSF, cytarabine and aclarubicin: A single center cohort study.

Jing Liu, Xiaohong Liu, Jinsong Jia, Lizhong Gong, Shengye Lu, Jing Wang, Xiao-Jun Huang, Hao Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia research reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jing LiuPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Xiaohong LiuPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jinsong JiaPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Lizhong GongPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Shengye LuPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jing WangPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Jun HuangPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Hao JiangPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNPeking University People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) are insensitive to conventional chemotherapy and, therefore, have a poor prognosis. To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of low-dose decitabine in combination with small-dose CAG regimen (D-CAG regimen) in treating AML-MRC, a total of 80 patients with newly diagnosed AML-MRC from September 2015 to January 2020 in our center were included in the study. Amongst these patients, 43 and 37 patients received two courses of the D-CAG and CAG regimens, respectively. The complete remission (CR) and complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) rate in the D-CAG group was higher than that of the CAG group (62.2% vs. 48.8%, P = 0.013). Among patients with less than 9 months of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) history and poor karyotypes, the (CR+CRi) rate of the D-CAG group was statistically higher than that of the CAG group. Except for patients receiving hematopoietic cell transplantation, among patients with less than 9 months of MDS history, the D-CAG group showed a better probability of overall survival than the CAG group did. In conclusion, patients with AML-MRC may benefit from the D-CAG regimen as an induction therapy, especially patients with less than 9 months of MDS history or with poor karyotypes.

Indexed as

AML-MRCCAG regimenD-CAG regimenDecitabine

Identifiers

PMID36304522
PMCPMC9594112
OpenAlexW4306770831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.