ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2022
Equity in water, sanitation, hygiene, and waste management services in healthcare facilities in Tanzania.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing risk communication for climate-sensitive neglected tropical diseases in Northern Tanzania: Integrating agropastoral community knowledge and health system strategies.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Analysis of water, sanitation, and hygiene facilities using the WASH-FIT approach and its relation to patient satisfaction and maternal mortality at hospitals in Indonesia.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To determine coverage and the reliability of water, sanitation, hygiene (WASH) and healthcare waste management (HCWM) services in healthcare facilities (HCFs) in Tanzania. Study design: Cross-sectional study design. Methods: Data of 1066 HCFs in Tanzania from the 2014-15 Tanzania Service Provision Assessment (TSPA) survey were analyzed. The availability of WASH and HCWM services was examined across facility locations, types, and managing authorities. Descriptive statistics, and bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: HCFs with improved water sources, with functional improved latrines for patients, and using the incineration method to treat sharps waste before final disposal were 81.2%, 70.6%, and 41.3%, respectively. Among the HCFs with improved water sources and with functional improved latrines for patients, 50.9% and 50.6% respectively experienced water outages. Rural HCFs were less likely to have water sources on-site within 500 m (AOR 0.41; 95%CI 0.24-0.68), and soap, running water or alcohol-based hand rub (AOR 0.54; 95%CI 0.37-0.80). Rural HCFs were 0.25 times less likely to have functioning improved latrines for patients than urban HCFs ( Conclusion: Access inequity in WASH and HCWM was observed in HCFs in rural areas and those under public management. To attain equity and sustainability, investing in improving WASH and HCWM services for both new and renovations projects, must consider the circumstance status of the marginalized society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.