Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36304399›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Nitrogen optimization coupled with alternate wetting and drying practice enhances rhizospheric nitrifier and denitrifier abundance and rice productivity.

Abbas Ali Abid, Qichun Zhang, Muhammad Faheem Adil, Itrat Batool, Muhammad Abbas, Zeshan Hassan, Azhar Abbas Khan, Antonio Castellano-Hinojosa, Syed Hassan Raza Zaidi, Hongjie Di and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Abbas Ali AbidZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Key Laboratory of Environment Remediation and Ecological Health, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Qichun ZhangZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Key Laboratory of Environment Remediation and Ecological Health, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Muhammad Faheem AdilDepartment of Agronomy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Institute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Itrat BatoolInstitute of Food Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Muhammad AbbasNational Engineering Laboratory for Improving Quality of Arable Land, Institute of Agricultural Resource and Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zeshan HassanCollege of Agriculture, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Layyah, Pakistan.
Azhar Abbas KhanCollege of Agriculture, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Layyah, Pakistan.
Antonio Castellano-HinojosaDepartment of Soil and Water Sciences, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Immokalee, FL, United States.
Syed Hassan Raza ZaidiDepartment of Agronomy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Institute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Hongjie DiZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Key Laboratory of Environment Remediation and Ecological Health, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Nader R AbdeslsalamDepartment of Agriculture Botany, Faculty of Agriculture, Saba Basha, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Zhejiang University · CNBahauddin Zakariya University · PKChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNAlexandria University · EGSouthwest Florida Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing nitrogen (N) fertilization without sacrificing grain yield is a major concern of rice production system because most of the applied N has been depleted from the soil and creating environmental consequences. Hence, limited information is available about nutrient management (NM) performance at a specific site under alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation compared to conventional permanent flooding (PF). We aimed to inquire about the performance of NM practices compared to the farmer's fertilizer practice (FFP) under PF and AWD on rhizospheric nitrifier and denitrifier abundance, rice yield, plant growth, and photosynthetic parameters. Two improved NM practices; nutrient management by pig manure (NMPM); 40% chemical N replaced by pig manure (organic N), and nutrient management by organic slow-release fertilizer (NMSR); 40% chemical N replaced by organic slow-release N were compared. The results showed an increased total grain yield (16.06%) during AWD compared to PF. Compared to conventional FFP, NMPM, and NMSR significantly increased the yields by 53.84 and 29.67%, respectively, during AWD. Meanwhile, PF prompted a yield increase of 45.07 and 28.75% for NMPM and NMSR, respectively, (

Indexed as

denitrifiernitrifiernutrient managementphotosynthesisriceslow-release fertilizerwater management

Identifiers

PMID36304399
PMCPMC9592971
OpenAlexW4304614147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.