Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36304397›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2022

Nanomaterials as an alternative to increase plant resistance to abiotic stresses.

Humberto Aguirre-Becerra, Ana Angélica Feregrino-Pérez, Karen Esquivel, Claudia Elena Perez-Garcia, Ma Cristina Vazquez-Hernandez, Aurora Mariana-Alvarado

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Development potential of nanoenabled agriculture projected using machine learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Elicitation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Humberto Aguirre-BecerraCuerpo Académico de Bioingeniería Básica y Aplicada, Facultad de Ingeniería - Campus Amazcala, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
Ana Angélica Feregrino-PérezCuerpo Académico de Bioingeniería Básica y Aplicada, Facultad de Ingeniería - Campus Amazcala, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
Karen EsquivelFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
Claudia Elena Perez-GarciaFacultad de Química, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
Ma Cristina Vazquez-HernandezCuerpo Académico de Innovación en Bioprocesos Sustentables, Depto. De Ingenierías, Tecnológico Nacional de México en Roque, Guanajuato, Mexico.
Aurora Mariana-AlvaradoFacultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficient use of natural resources without negative repercussions to the environment has encouraged the incursion of nanotechnology to provide viable alternatives in diverse areas, including crop management. Agriculture faces challenges due to the combination of different abiotic stresses where nanotechnology can contribute with promising applications. In this context, several studies report that the application of nanoparticles and nanomaterials positively affects crop productivity through different strategies such as green synthesis of nanoparticles, plant targeted protection through the application of nanoherbicides and nanofungicides, precise and constant supply of nutrients through nanofertilizers, and tolerance to abiotic stress (e.g., low or high temperatures, drought, salinity, low or high light intensities, UV-B, metals in soil) by several mechanisms such as activation of the antioxidant enzyme system that alleviates oxidative stress. Thus, the present review focuses on the benefits of NPs against these type of stress and their possible action mechanisms derived from the interaction between nanoparticles and plants, and their potential application for improving agricultural practices.

Indexed as

abiotic stresselicitornanomaterialsnanoparticlesplant eustresssecondary metabolites

Identifiers

PMID36304397
PMCPMC9593029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.