Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36304372›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection With Femoral Central Access Versus Internal Jugular Access in Patients Admitting to Medical Intensive Care Unit.

Syed Bilal Hafeez, Arslan Ahmed, Aftab Akhtar, Wasib Ishtiaq, Najam Ul Sehar Javed, Kiran Abbas, Maryam Khan, Hammad Zafar, Areesha Jawed

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Venous access devices (Review).Medicine international
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Syed Bilal HafeezDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shifa International Hospital Islamabad, Islamabad, PAK.
Arslan AhmedDepartment of Internal Medicine, Shifa International Hospital Islamabad, Islamabad, PAK.
Aftab AkhtarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Shifa International Hospital Islamabad, Islamabad, PAK.
Wasib IshtiaqDepartment of Internal Medicine, Shifa International Hospital Islamabad, Islamabad, PAK.
Najam Ul Sehar JavedDepartment of Research, Shifa International Hospital Islamabad, Islamabad, PAK.
Kiran AbbasDepartment of Medicine, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, PAK.
Maryam KhanDepartment of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Civil Hospital Karachi, Karachi, PAK.
Hammad ZafarDepartment of Medicine, Services Hospital Lahore, Lahore, PAK.
Areesha JawedDepartment of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Civil Hospital Karachi, Karachi, PAK.
Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center · PKAga Khan University Hospital · PKServices Hospital · PKDow University of Health Sciences · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The current research focused on studying the pattern of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) with femoral central access versus internal jugular access in patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU). Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Emergency Medicine, Shifa International Hospital, between March 4, 2022, and August 4, 2022. All individuals who presented to the ICU who needed a central venous catheter (CVC) for more than 48 hours were included. Catheter insertion was not permitted if the patient had a history of dermatitis or burns at the site of insertion or if the hemodialysis procedure necessitated the insertion of the catheter into a blood vessel. Three groups of patients were created: group A patients had been diagnosed with CRBSI; group B patients had catheter colonization (CC); and group C did not have CRBSI or CC. Standard microbiological methods were used to identify all of the bacteria collected from the cultures. All data was documented in a predefined pro forma. Results Overall, 20 (12.12%) patients had positive CRBSI, 68 (41.5%) had CC, and the remaining 46.3% of cultures were negative. Elderly populations were more prone to acquiring CRBSI showing a significant correlation between older age and CRBSI (p < 0.0001). CC was significantly associated with a longer duration of ICU stay, i.e., 30.3 ± 3.7 (p = 0.003). The absence of both CRBSI and CC was significantly associated with a lower duration of catheterization (11 ± 8.5 days in group C versus 22.1 ± 6.9 and 18.7 ± 7 days in groups A and B, respectively; p < 0.0001). Our study revealed a higher risk of CRBSI when the femoral access was compared to the internal jugular access (58.3% vs. 41.7%; p = 0.0008). The study did not find any significant association of CC with femoral or internal jugular access. Furthermore, a significantly higher rate of negative cultures was reported in patients with internal jugular access as compared to femoral vein access (85.8% vs. 14.2%; p = 0.007). Conclusion The need for routinely monitoring and observing the microbiological spectrum in patients receiving care in intensive care units is highlighted by the current investigation. The patients with internal jugular vein access had a decreased incidence of CRBSI and CC, while those with femoral access experienced CRBSI more frequently.

Indexed as

catheter related bloodstream infectionscentral venous accesscolonizationcrbsifemoral accessinternal jugular venous access

Identifiers

PMID36304372
PMCPMC9586494
OpenAlexW4296754533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.