ArticleCureus2022
Cytological Grading of Breast Carcinomas and Its Prognostic Implications.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Determining the histological grade of breast carcinomas before mastectomy is necessary to decide about neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Core needle biopsies used for this purpose often under-grade the tumour. The grade obtained from fine needle aspiration cytology samples will help in such situations and whenever biopsy is not done, as in a resource-poor setup. Many studies are being done to find out the cytological grading system that correlates well with histological grading. Methods This study was done between 2016 and 2019 including the cases in which both modified radical mastectomy and fine needle aspiration of the tumour had been done. Robinson's cytological grading was done in Papanicolaou and haematoxylin & eosin (H&E) stained cytology smears and correlated with modified Bloom-Richardson histologic grading done in modified radical mastectomy specimens. We also studied the prognostic significance of Robinson's method by studying the association between cytological grade and lymph node metastasis. Results Sixty cases were studied. The two methods had the same grade in 49 (81.7%) cases. They showed a significant positive correlation (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.848, p-0.0001), significant association (Chi-square test, p-0.0001), and substantial agreement (kappa value 0.72). Multiple regression analysis showed chromatin score and nucleoli score as the most influential parameters. Lymph node metastasis showed significant association with cytological grade (p-0.0003), cell dissociation score (p-0.0001), nucleoli score (p-0.01), and chromatin score (p-0.04). Conclusion Robinson's cytological grading is a simple, reliable adjunct/alternative to core needle biopsies for grading breast carcinomas before mastectomy. Hence, it can be made a part of routine cytology reporting of breast carcinomas. Further long-term studies will help in confirming its prognostic significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.