ArticleCureus2022
Quality of Life Amongst Multidrug-Resistant TB Patients: An Exploratory Study About Distributive Dimensions and Interactions.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effects of stigma and social support on the health-related quality of life of people with drug resistance tuberculosis in Lagos, Nigeria.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Assessment of the impact of COVID-19 on tuberculosis care at a tertiary hospital: integrating lessons from COVID-19 learned.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB has emerged as a major challenge to eliminate TB as envisioned at policy level. Distinctive traits associated with the disease such as physical, psychosocial and environmental dimensions may influence the treatment outcome in both directions. Quality of life (QoL) indicators may capture these traits distinctively.
objectiveTo quantify the differential effect of MDR-TB on specific QoL domains, their distributions across the strata and to check for possible interactions.
methodThis community-based cross-sectional study was conducted on 98 MDR-TB patients registered in the calendar year 2017 under National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme (NTEP) in a central Indian district using the WHO-QoL BREF Scale by patients in their vicinity. The transformed domain scores were descriptively summarized, stratified and exploratory visualised. Likert mapping for each item was done. A two-way ANOVA test was applied to check differences across strata and interaction effects were calculated.
resultParticipants perceived a higher QoL in the social domain (median score 69, IQR 56-75) while the psychological health domain (median 31 IQR 20.5-44) was professed as most negotiated by disease. More than 50% of participants were found to be dissatisfied with their assumed physical status in item-wise analysis. A statistically significant interaction (p=0.008) was detected with education strata to income tertile most evident in the physical domain while psychological domain alone (p=0.017) without significant interaction with treatment duration (p=0.316) was associated with the type of TB. Overall QoL scores were tilted in favour of an urban setting, male gender and towards a relatively younger population.
conclusionThe overall deficits in QoL are evident in the study, per se in the psychological and physical domains. Moreover there is an inequitable distribution of these scores as revealed in the study. Inclusion of an additional parameter of periodical QoL assessment may thus predict the outcome at individual level and may address this inequity at policy level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.