ArticleCureus2022
Outcomes of Sinus Laser Therapy in Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Single-Center Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of sinus laser associated closure (SiLaC) versus endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT) in the management of pilonidal sinus disease.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of laser ablation for recurrent pilonidal sinus: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Pooled it
- Sinus laser-assisted closure for pilonidal sinus disease: a prospective single-center study.Annals of coloproctology · 2026Article
- Future of pilonidal cyst surgery: a comparative review of traditional and laser techniques.BMC surgery · 2025Review
- Efficacy of crystallized and liquid form phenol application in pilonidal sinus disease: a single-center retrospective study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- Sinus laser therapy versus Karydakis flap procedure in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a comparative analysis of intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcome.Techniques in coloproctology · 2024Article
- [Effectiveness of fascial tissue flaps and skin flaps with layered sutures for repair of wounds after excision of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease (SPND) is an acquired chronic disease with no precise etiopathogenesis. The morbidity associated with the disease necessitates the implementation of new techniques, such as sinus laser therapy (SiLaT), to improve disease management. However, surgical techniques as of now are preferred as the mainstay mode of treatment. A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate and report the healing outcome of the application of SiLaT on patients with SPND at a tertiary center. All patients who underwent SiLaT for primary or recurrent pilonidal sinus from February 2012 to December 2019 were included in the study and followed up for at least six months. Forty-one participants (37 males (90.2%) and four females (9.8%)) were included. Of the participants, 58.5% presented with chief complaints of painful swelling with mucopurulent discharge. Most of the participants were students (43.9%). SiLaT was the primary intervention for 82.9% of the participants. The mean duration of hospital stays, resumption of regular activity, and complete wound healing by secondary intention were 30±21.5 hours, 18.4±14.3 days, and 6.5±6.6 weeks, respectively. Around 95.1% of wounds healed without complications. The overall recurrence rate was 24.4%, while the recurrence rate with SiLaT being the primary intervention was 11.8%. Only three (7.32%) patients experienced wound infections as postoperative complications. The visual analog scale (VAS) score decreased postoperatively in the first and second weeks to 3.9±3.2 and 1.9±1.9, respectively, and 78.1% of the total patients showed satisfaction post-surgical interventions. The current study showed that the SiLaT technique is a feasible technology with promising results to evolve. Further studies are encouraged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.