ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2022
DivCom: A Tool for Systematic Partition of Groups of Microbial Profiles Into Intrinsic Subclusters and Distance-Based Subgroup Comparisons.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut microbiota shifts and short-chain fatty acids alterations in pediatric epilepsy patients on a Mediterranean ketogenic diet.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026Observational
- The infant microbiota hopscotches between community states toward maturation-longitudinal stool parameters and microbiota development in a cohort of European toddlers.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Skin microbiome-biophysical association: a first integrative approach to classifying Korean skin types and aging groups.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Persistent Dysbiosis, Parasite Rise and Growth Impairment in Aquacultured European Seabass after Oxytetracycline Treatment.Microorganisms · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When analyzing microbiome data, one of the main objectives is to effectively compare the microbial profiles of samples belonging to different groups. Beta diversity measures the level of similarity among samples, usually in the form of dissimilarity matrices. The use of suitable statistical tests in conjunction with those matrices typically provides us with all the necessary information to evaluate the overall similarity of groups of microbial communities. However, in some cases, this approach can lead us to deceptive conclusions, mainly due to the uneven dispersions of the groups and the existence of unique or unexpected substructures in the dataset. To address these issues, we developed divide and compare (DivCom), an automated tool for advanced beta diversity analysis. DivCom reveals the inner structure of groups by dividing their samples into the appropriate number of clusters and then compares the distances of every profile to the centers of these clusters. This information can be used for determining the existing interrelation of the groups. The proposed methodology and the developed tool were assessed by comparing the response of anemic patients with or without inflammatory bowel disease to different iron replacement therapies. DivCom generated results that revealed the inner structure of the dataset, evaluated the relationship among the clusters, and assessed the effect of the treatments. The DivCom tool is freely available at: https://github.com/Lagkouvardos/DivCom.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.