Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36304302›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioinformatics2022

Metagenomic Analysis Using Phylogenetic Placement-A Review of the First Decade.

Lucas Czech, Alexandros Stamatakis, Micah Dunthorn, Pierre Barbera

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic insights intoMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Constructing phylogenetic trees for microbiome data analysis: A mini-review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lucas CzechDepartment of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, United States.
Alexandros StamatakisComputational Molecular Evolution Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Heidelberg, Germany.
Micah DunthornNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Pierre BarberaIndependent Researcher, Bisingen, Germany.
Department of Plant Biology · USHeidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies · DEUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenetic placement refers to a family of tools and methods to analyze, visualize, and interpret the tsunami of metagenomic sequencing data generated by high-throughput sequencing. Compared to alternative (e. g., similarity-based) methods, it puts metabarcoding sequences into a phylogenetic context using a set of known reference sequences and taking evolutionary history into account. Thereby, one can increase the accuracy of metagenomic surveys and eliminate the requirement for having exact or close matches with existing sequence databases. Phylogenetic placement constitutes a valuable analysis tool

Indexed as

evolutionary placementmetabarcodingmetagenomicsphylogenetic placementphylogeneticssequence identificationspecies diversitytaxonomic assignment

Identifiers

PMID36304302
PMCPMC9580882
OpenAlexW4226432751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.