Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36304294›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2022

The Importance of Weakly Co-Evolving Residue Networks in Proteins is Revealed by Visual Analytics.

Sidharth Mohan, Hatice Gulcin Ozer, William C Ray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sidharth MohanInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Biophysics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Hatice Gulcin OzerInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Biophysics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
William C RayInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Biophysics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small changes in a protein's core packing produce changes in function, and even small changes in function bias species fitness and survival. Therefore individually deleterious mutations should be evolutionarily coupled with compensating mutations that recover fitness. Co-evolving pairs of mutations should be littered across evolutionary history. Despite longstanding intuition, the results of co-evolution analyses have largely disappointed expectations. Regardless of the statistics applied, only a small majority of the most strongly co-evolving residues are typically found to be in contact, and much of the "meaning" of observed co-evolution has been opaque. In a medium-sized protein of 300 amino acids, there are almost 20 million potentially-important interdependencies. It is impossible to understand this data in textual format without extreme summarization or truncation. And, due to summarization and truncation, it is impossible to identify most patterns in the data. We developed a visualization approach that eschews the common "look at a long list of statistics" approach and instead enables the user to literally look at all of the co-evolution statistics simultaneously. Users of our tool reported visually obvious "clouds" of co-evolution statistics forming distinct patterns in the data, and analysis demonstrated that these clouds had structural relevance. To determine whether this phenomenon generalized, we repeated this experiment in three proteins we had not previously studied. The results provide evidence about how structural constrains have impacted co-evolution, why previous "examine the most frequently co-evolving residues" approaches have had limited success, and additionally shed light on the biophysical importance of different types of co-evolution.

Indexed as

analyticscontactcorrelationsevolutionproteinsstructurevisualization

Identifiers

PMID36304294
PMCPMC9580873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.