Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36304289›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2022

Caveats to Deep Learning Approaches to RNA Secondary Structure Prediction.

Christoph Flamm, Julia Wielach, Michael T Wolfinger, Stefan Badelt, Ronny Lorenz, Ivo L Hofacker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Identification of RNA structures and their roles in RNA functions.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tailor made: the art of therapeutic mRNA design.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christoph FlammDepartment of Theoretical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Julia WielachDepartment of Theoretical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael T WolfingerDepartment of Theoretical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan BadeltDepartment of Theoretical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ronny LorenzDepartment of Theoretical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ivo L HofackerDepartment of Theoretical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) and in particular deep learning techniques have gained popularity for predicting structures from biopolymer sequences. An interesting case is the prediction of RNA secondary structures, where well established biophysics based methods exist. The accuracy of these classical methods is limited due to lack of experimental parameters and certain simplifying assumptions and has seen little improvement over the last decade. This makes RNA folding an attractive target for machine learning and consequently several deep learning models have been proposed in recent years. However, for ML approaches to be competitive for

Indexed as

biophysical modeldataset biasesdeep learning modelfolding predictionRNA secondary structure

Identifiers

PMID36304289
PMCPMC9580944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.