ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2022
Reliable and Scalable Identification and Prioritization of Putative Cellulolytic Anaerobes With Large Genome Data.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural and functional insights into cellulosomes: masters of plant cell wall degradation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- A genomic analysis reveals the diversity of cellulosome displaying bacteria.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the era of high-throughput sequencing, genetic information that is inherently whispering hints of the microbes' functional niches is becoming easily accessible; however, properly identifying and characterizing these genetic hints to infer the microbes' functional niches remains a challenge. Regarding genome-centric interpretation on the specific functional niche of cellulose hydrolysis for anaerobes, often encountered in practice is a lack of confidence in predicting the anaerobes' real cellulolytic competency based solely on abundances of the varying carbohydrate-active enzyme modules annotated or on their taxonomy affiliation. Recognition of the synergy machineries that include but not limited to the cellulosome gene clusters is equally important as the annotation of individual carbohydrate-active modules or genes. In the interpretation of complete genomes of 2,768 microbe strains whose phenotypes have been well documented, with the incorporation of an automatic recognition of synergy among the carbohydrate active elements annotated, an explicit genotype-phenotype correlation was evidenced to be feasible for cellulolytic anaerobes, and a bioinformatic pipeline was developed accordingly. This genome-centric pipeline would categorize putative cellulolytic anaerobes into six genotype groups based on differential cellulose-hydrolyzing capacity and varying synergy mechanisms. Suggested in this genotype-phenotype correlation analysis was a finer categorization of the cellulosome gene clusters: although cellulosome complexes, by their nature, could enable the assembly of a number of carbohydrate-active units, they do not certainly guarantee the formation of the cellulose-enzyme-microbe complex or the cellulose-hydrolyzing activity of the corresponding anaerobe strains, for example, the well-known
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.