ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2022
NetRank Recovers Known Cancer Hallmark Genes as Universal Biomarker Signature for Cancer Outcome Prediction.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-Cancer Detectability of ctDNA Biomarkers in Asian Populations: Implications for Pan-Cancer Detection.Cancer management and research · 2026Review
- Pan-cancer analysis shapes the understanding of cancer biology and medicine.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2025Review
- Netrank: network-based approach for biomarker discovery.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Delineating the glioblastoma stemness by genes involved in cytoskeletal rearrangements and metabolic alterations.World journal of stem cells · 2023Review
- Identification of protein-protein interaction bridges for multiple sclerosis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene expression can serve as a powerful predictor for disease progression and other phenotypes. Consequently, microarrays, which capture gene expression genome-wide, have been used widely over the past two decades to derive biomarker signatures for tasks such as cancer grading, prognosticating the formation of metastases, survival, and others. Each of these signatures was selected and optimized for a very specific phenotype, tissue type, and experimental set-up. While all of these differences may naturally contribute to very heterogeneous and different biomarker signatures, all cancers share characteristics regardless of particular cell types or tissue as summarized in the hallmarks of cancer. These commonalities could give rise to biomarker signatures, which perform well across different phenotypes, cell and tissue types. Here, we explore this possibility by employing a network-based approach for pan-cancer biomarker discovery. We implement a random surfer model, which integrates interaction, expression, and phenotypic information to rank genes by their suitability for outcome prediction. To evaluate our approach, we assembled 105 high-quality microarray datasets sampled from around 13,000 patients and covering 13 cancer types. We applied our approach (NetRank) to each dataset and aggregated individual signatures into one compact signature of 50 genes. This signature stands out for two reasons. First, in contrast to other signatures of the 105 datasets, it is performant across nearly all cancer types and phenotypes. Second, It is interpretable, as the majority of genes are linked to the hallmarks of cancer in general and proliferation specifically. Many of the identified genes are cancer drivers with a known mutation burden linked to cancer. Overall, our work demonstrates the power of network-based approaches to compose robust, compact, and universal biomarker signatures for cancer outcome prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.