ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2022
Retrospective Evaluation of Patients Underwent Ganglion Impar Pulsed Radiofrequency due to Coccydynia.
Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management strategies of pediatric coccydynia: a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Management of coccygodynia: talking points from a systematic review of recent clinical trials.Annals of joint · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Although ganglion impar blockade has long been an effective procedure in the treatment of coccydynia, the pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the ganglion impar (GI) is a relatively new approach for the management of coccydynia. In the present study, we aimed to retrospectively evaluate patients who underwent GI PRF due to coccydynia. Methods: Twenty-six patients diagnosed with coccydynia and treated with a PRF of the GI were included in this retrospective study. Clinical characteristics of the patients and treatment success were evaluated. Pain intensity was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). Results: The study included 19 (73.1%) female and 7 (26.9%) male patients. The median age of the patients was 45 (IQR: 24-60) years, and the etiology of pain was trauma in 21 (80.8%) of the 26 patients evaluated. There was a statistically significant decrease in VAS scores after GI PRF (Respectively; 6 [IQR: 6-7] and 2 [IQR: 0-3]). The PRF of the GI treatment success was 84.6%. Treatment success was 100% in patients with neuropathic pain and 59.1% in patients with nociceptive pain. Conclusion: GI PRF is an effective and reliable procedure with low complication rate for pain relief in coccydynia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.